Conciseness

Mostly efficient — hardcoded paths, a compact branch-difference table, and terse examples — but the '自动转换的范围' section and the 18-bullet Gotchas list encode extremely fine-grained historical incident detail ('互斥格式句不能只替换格式名…', '输出契约不只在 Markdown 文档里…') that reads as accumulated changelog rather than current instruction, and inline time-sensitive dates ('2026-06-12 起') are not isolated in a deprecated/old-patterns section. This matches 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'; it is not 4 because several Gotchas entries could be consolidated or moved out, and not 2 because nothing explains concepts Claude already knows.

Actionability

Concrete, executable material throughout: exact repo paths and URL ('SKILLS_REPO="$HOME/code/ljg-skills"', 'git@github.com:lijigang/ljg-skills.git'), runnable flags ('/ljg-push --skip-readme-check', '--dry-run'), a copy-paste curl notification block, and a precise README-gate procedure. This matches 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps' — the gap is that the core execution is delegated to 'Workflows/Push.md' and 'Tools/Push.sh', whose contents are not shown in the bundle. Not 5 for that same reason; not 3 because what is written is real commands and specifics, not pseudocode.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is clearly stated and ordered — README consistency gate (hard gate that aborts on mismatch), master push first, then md conversion/push, then auto-switch back to master — with the rationale ('md 分支的 markdown 化基于 master 的 org 版本做转换'), plus a --dry-run checkpoint and pre-commit residual audits. This matches 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. Not 5 because the actual step list lives in the referenced 'Workflows/Push.md', which is not available in the bundle, so the fine-grained steps and error-recovery loops cannot be confirmed; not 3 because explicit validation (README gate, dry-run, audits) is present for this batch operation.

Progressive Disclosure

The body has good section structure (仓库路径, 分支差异, 工作流, README 一致性, 自动转换范围, Examples, Gotchas), but it references 'Workflows/Push.md' and 'Tools/Push.sh' and neither file exists in the bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories at all), and ~30 lines of intricate mdize conversion rules that belong in a dedicated reference file are inlined in SKILL.md. This matches 'Some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline'. Not 4 because the referenced files are missing from the bundle and the inlined conversion-rule bulk is exactly the content the 4-anchor says should be placed out; not 2 because sections are well-labeled and navigable rather than a monolithic wall.

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — '把 ~/.agents/skills/ljg-* 里所有更新过的 skills 同步到 github repo', '先推 master 分支', '再切 md 分支…做基础 markdown 化后推' — covering the full pipeline (detect, sync, push master, convert, push md). This matches the anchor 'Lists multiple specific concrete actions; comprehensive coverage'; a 4 would require minor gaps in coverage, but sync, both branches, and the conversion step are all named.

Completeness

It explicitly answers 'what' (syncs updated ljg-* skills to the ljg-skills github repo, pushing master then a markdown-ized md branch) and 'when' ('Use when user says /ljg-push, push skills, … or whenever ljg-* skills get updated and need shipping'). This matches the anchor 'Clearly and explicitly answers both what AND when with concrete trigger phrases'; 4 would require the 'when' to be less explicit, which it is not.

Trigger Term Quality

Trigger coverage includes the literal command '/ljg-push' plus natural phrases in two languages — 'push skills', '推送 skills', '同步 skills', 'sync ljg' — plus the situational trigger 'whenever ljg-* skills get updated and need shipping'. This matches the anchor for comprehensive coverage including synonyms; a 4 would mean a few natural terms are missing, but both English and Chinese variants are present.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It is scoped to a named repo ('ljg-skills'), named skill family ('ljg-*'), and adds an explicit exclusion — 'NOT FOR pushing non-ljg skills or arbitrary git repos' — which minimizes conflict with generic git/push skills. This matches 'Clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk'; 4 would require minor overlap risk, but the NOT-FOR clause closes that.