Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable preflight workflow: every check is executable, sequenced, and validated, with error-recovery guidance and a clear results report. The two weaknesses are minor — duplicated git commands across checks, and a dangling reference to commit-workflow.md that is not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the repeated commands: Checks 1, 5, and 7 all restate `git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD` (and Checks 0/6 repeat the `git log --format` command) — reference the earlier check's command instead.
Fix the dangling reference: `commit-workflow.md` is cited in Check 6 but no such file exists in the bundle — either add it under references/ or inline the needed commit conventions.
Consider moving the protected-files list (Check 5) to a references/ file if it grows, keeping SKILL.md as the overview of which paths are protected and why.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean overall — no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, and repo-specific rationale ("Fetch first — every check below diffs against origin/main", fail-fast matching the CI job) earns its place. Falls short of anchor 5 because `git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD` is repeated verbatim in Checks 1, 5, and 7, and the `git log --format` command appears twice — minor duplication that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: exact bash commands (`git fetch origin main`, `./scripts/cli lint-changed`, `cd frontend && pnpm run lint`), an exact protected-file path list, concrete fix steps ("fix with `pnpm format` from the repo root then `git add -p`"), and a copy-paste-ready report template. Anchor 5 match — the commands cover the common cases as-is. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Checks 0–7 are clearly sequenced with per-step evaluation criteria, explicit checkpoints ("Resolve any issues before proceeding"), a documented feedback loop (fail-fast means "fix and re-run to see the next check"), and a final checklist-style report. This matches anchor 5: explicit validation steps, error-recovery loops, and a checklist for a complex process. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with content appropriately placed in a single well-sectioned file — nothing is inlined that clearly belongs in a separate file, so this is not anchor 3. However, the body's one reference ("per `commit-workflow.md`") points to a file that does not exist in the bundle (no references/ directory), a minor navigation gap that keeps it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |