Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction skill with a clear workflow and an explicit validation feedback loop. Its main gap is reliance on external ADRs for actionable detail rather than bundling concrete test-writing guidance.
Suggestions
Inline a minimal concrete example of adding/registering a suite case so the core task is actionable without reading the external ADRs.
Add a short validation checklist or explicit "suite green" confirmation step to make the feedback loop checkpoint more concrete.
Where the skill relies on external ADRs, note the key convention to follow inline so a reader can act without the ADRs being present.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section (When to use, Source of truth, Workflow, Run, Guardrails, Output) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete entrypoint path and run command plus specific ADR references, but the core test-writing steps defer most specifics to external ADRs rather than providing copy-paste-ready inline guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation feedback loop in step 4 ("Run the affected suite locally and fix failures until green"), matching the anchor for clear sequence with error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is clean with clear sections and one-level-deep references to two ADRs plus a default entrypoint; it stops short of a 5 because the detailed references are external docs outside the skill bundle rather than bundled, verifiable reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |