Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers concrete, executable commands in a clearly sequenced workflow, but pays a heavy token tax through repeated restatement of the 3-word rule and duplicated examples. Bundling the actual search.sh script and trimming the keyword-rule sections to a single table would fix both weak spots.
Suggestions
State the 3-word rule once (in one table covering word limits per search type plus good/bad keywords) and delete the redundant "Critical" section, "Why" bullets, "Key principle", Tips item 6, and the Quick Start block that repeats Step 1's examples verbatim.
Include the referenced search.sh script in the bundle (or a scripts/ file) so the documented commands are actually executable, and show one short example of interpreting search/extract output (e.g. which fields to read and how to pick URLs worth extracting).
Add a brief error-recovery loop to the workflow, e.g. 'If no relevant results, retry with a different keyword strategy (unique code snippet vs. competition+name) before pivoting to another ctf-* skill'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 3-word rule is restated roughly six times (Step 1 comments, the "Critical" section's two tables, the Keyword Rules table, the "Why" bullets, the "Key principle", and Tips item 6), and Quick Start duplicates Step 1's examples verbatim — e.g. "DASCTF URL Storage" appears four times — making several sections padded rather than additive. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and copy-paste ready ("./search.sh search \"DASCTF URL Storage\"", "./search.sh extract \"https://example.com/writeup\""), but the referenced search.sh script is absent from the bundle and no guidance follows on interpreting extract output, leaving minor gaps below fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (Search → Review results → Extract → Analyze/Pivot) with an implicit checkpoint ("If a search result looks promising"), but no error-recovery feedback loops for empty results, API/quota failures, or keyword retries, so it falls short of the explicit-validation anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single file is well organized with clear sections (Prerequisites, API Overview, workflow steps, When to Pivot, Quick Start, Tips), though the ~60-line keyword-example bank is inlined where a separate reference file could carry it — minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |