Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable read-only audit skill with concrete labels, a copy-paste output template, and clear sequencing. Its only notable gap is that validation lives in one end-of-process checklist rather than interleaved checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add an explicit inline validation checkpoint mid-workflow (e.g., after step 4) so the quality check is not only an end recap.
De-duplicate the scope/source/unit/windows and Missing-label guidance shared between 'Required inputs' and Workflow step 1 to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Quotes lean directive sections ('Inventory supplied metrics and outcomes. Preserve definitions.') with no padding about what outreach sequences are; minor redundancy between 'Required inputs' and Workflow step 1 (both restate scope/source/unit/windows and the Missing label) keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Quotes copy-paste-ready labels and a full output template ('DRAFT ONLY — READ-ONLY AUDIT', 'Actions taken: None', the markdown block) plus specific step directives — fully executable guidance for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Quotes a clear 7-step sequence ending in a 'Quality check' validation list; not a 5 because validation is a single end-of-process recap rather than interleaved checkpoints, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Quotes well-organized single-file sections (Purpose, Required inputs, Workflow, Output format, Guardrails, Quality check, Example invocation) with no nested references; the skill needs no external bundle files, so clean sectioning earns the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |