Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean instruction skill with a clearly sequenced, validation-rich workflow and a concrete output template; its only weak spot is slight verbosity in the guardrail list.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining what accounts or signals are; a few guardrail bullets could be condensed further, keeping it just short of fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, executable guidance — a numbered workflow, an explicit output-format template, and a quality check — though as an instruction-only skill it lacks code, which is acceptable here. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The seven-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (date separation, TIMING UNVERIFIED labels, exclusion of uncited/out-of-window items, eligibility gating) and a closing quality-check loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed, the content is organized into well-signaled sections (Purpose, Required inputs, Workflow, Output format, Guardrails, Quality check), meeting the simple-skill bar for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |