Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, guardrail-heavy instruction skill with a concrete output template and clear workflow, appropriate for a non-destructive planning task. Weakest only in lacking a worked example and an explicit error-retry loop.
Suggestions
Add one short worked example showing the output template populated with fictional records to lift actionability toward a 5.
Add an explicit feedback loop in the workflow (e.g., 'If a hard gate check fails, mark eligibility Not evaluated and record the failed gate in Unknowns') to strengthen workflow clarity.
Consider noting in the Output format that the Candidates table rows should mirror the supplied/actually-retrieved accounts only, to make the template self-enforcing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding, no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, and each section (Purpose, Workflow, Output format, Guardrails, Quality check) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete copy-paste output template with explicit table columns and specific field-labeling rules ('Missing', 'Plan', 'Not evaluated'), but lacks a filled worked example showing the template populated. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step workflow with an eligibility hard-gate check (step 5) and a final Quality-check checklist, but no explicit retry/feedback loop for when a check fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained single-file skill with no need for external references, organized into well-signaled sections that make navigation easy; no bundle files are present or needed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |