Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a strong example of a focused, repo-specific skill: executable code, exact commands, a sequenced workflow with explicit validation, and tight prose that assumes Claude's intelligence. It maximizes every dimension without verbosity or padding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what TypeScript, regex, or git are, and every section (mapping tables, matching semantics, pitfalls) earns its place with non-obvious, repo-specific detail. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready code for the enum member, imports, and mapping entry, exact verification commands (`bun run type-check`, the grep with expected '2×2' hits), and concrete precedent entries to follow for the append-vs-new-entry decision. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The provider workflow is a clearly numbered sequence with an explicit RN-repeat step, and the Verification and Commit pitfalls sections add real validation checkpoints (type-check, grep completeness check, `git show --stat HEAD`) with feedback loops for a batch/duplicated operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are present (references/scripts/assets are absent), so the single self-contained SKILL.md is correctly organized into well-signaled sections with no nested or buried references; nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |