Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-sequenced orchestration playbook with concrete paths, commands, and decision tables, and it wisely reinforces its single most important invariant (one file written) in a critical_requirement block. Its main gap is that the five Phase 1 subagent prompts — the actual executable heart of the skill — are missing, and there is no error-recovery guidance for failed or empty subagent results.
Suggestions
Provide the actual prompts (or a reference file containing them) for the five Phase 1 subagents so the orchestration is reproducible rather than improvised.
Add a short failure-handling step in Phase 2: what to do if a subagent fails, returns empty results, or the YAML frontmatter validation fails.
Consolidate the one-file rule — state it once in the critical_requirement block and let the Common Mistakes table reference it rather than repeating it in Phase 2's numbered steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — it never explains what YAML frontmatter or subagents are, and uses compact tables for subagent roles, refresh conditions, and common mistakes. It falls short of anchor 5 only because the single-file rule is stated three times (the critical_requirement block, Phase 2's numbered steps, and two rows of the Common Mistakes table), which is trimmable redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete details are present — the exact output path 'docs/solutions/[category]/[filename].md', the 'mkdir -p docs/solutions/[category]/' command, invocation syntax, and decision tables for Phases 2.5 and 3. However, the core executable content of an orchestration skill — the prompts to give the five Phase 1 subagents — is entirely absent, so Claude must invent them each run; this is a key missing detail (anchor 3) rather than a minor gap (anchor 4). | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0.5 → 1 → 2 → 2.5 → 3 are explicitly sequenced, with 'WAIT for all Phase 1 subagents to complete', a 'Validate YAML frontmatter' checkpoint before the write, and a Common Mistakes table that reinforces ordering and the one-file invariant. It misses anchor 5 because there is no error-recovery guidance — e.g., what to do if a subagent fails or returns empty/poor results, or how to handle a YAML validation failure. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the body is well-organized with clear sections (Overview, When to Use, Quick Reference, phased Implementation, Common Mistakes) and no nested references. At ~110 lines it exceeds the 'under 50 lines' simple-skill exception, and the content that would justify external references (subagent prompt templates, category taxonomy details) is simply absent rather than externalized, so anchor 4 (good structure, minor organization gaps) fits better than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |