Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and mostly lean, with genuinely concrete per-step guidance and a strong Ruby/Rails-specific suspect list. Its two real defects are a dangling reference to a nonexistent `template.md` (which both blocks the core output's layout and breaks progressive disclosure) and the absence of any verification step for the stated file/line caps and redaction pass.
Suggestions
Add the actual `template.md` to the bundle (e.g. references/template.md) containing the oracle-prompt section layout, or inline the section list in Step 6 — currently "Use the structure in `template.md`" points to a file that does not exist.
Close the validation gap: add a check after Step 6 (e.g. confirm total attached lines ≤2000 and re-grep the written file for the secret patterns before reporting) so the stated caps and redaction step are verified, not just declared.
Trim the two long rationale paragraphs (the model-orchestration decoupling rationale in Overview and the leak-recovery rationale in Step 5) to a single line each, and consider dropping or shortening the Quick Reference table that duplicates The Process.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, imperative, and high-signal (concrete bash block, hard caps "≤8 files, ≤2000 total lines", terse anti-patterns), but the long rationale paragraphs — "keeping prompt-construction decoupled from model-orchestration keeps the skill model-agnostic (works with any oracle the user picks — Codex, Claude, Gemini, paste-into-chat) ..." and the swap-file/backup lecture in Step 5 — plus the Quick Reference table that duplicates The Process could be trimmed, matching the 4 anchor (efficient with minor over-explanation). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Most steps are concrete (copy-paste bash for project detection, exact output path and invocation template, redaction regex), but Step 6 — "Use the structure in `template.md`" — defers the core deliverable's structure to a file that does not exist anywhere in the bundle, leaving the actual oracle-prompt layout missing; that is a missing key detail, matching the 3 anchor rather than 4's "minor gaps". | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with an explicit ordering constraint ("This step must run before Step 6, not after"), fallback paths, and a recap table match the 4 anchor (clear sequence, most checkpoints present); it is not 5 because there is no verification step — the caps (≤8 files / ≤2000 lines) and redaction are stated but never checked against the written file. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | In-body structure is good (Overview → When to Use → Process → Anti-patterns), but the skill's only external reference — "See `template.md` for the exact section layout", referenced twice — points to a file that does not exist in the bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), so the deferred detail is unreachable; per the rubric's guidance to score against the actual bundle structure, this is a 3, not 4's "minor organization gaps". | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |