Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging pure Ruby code — idiomatic patterns, modern 3.x+ features (pattern matching, Data.define, endless methods), error handling conventions (raise vs fail, result objects), memoization, and performance idioms. For Rails use rails-guides. For testing use minitest. For code style use sandi-metz-rules.
77
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly defines its scope (pure Ruby code), lists specific capabilities and modern language features, and explicitly states when to use it. The boundary-setting by referencing complementary skills (rails-guides, minitest, sandi-metz-rules) is a strong differentiator that minimizes overlap and conflict risk.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and capabilities: writing/reviewing/debugging Ruby code, pattern matching, Data.define, endless methods, error handling conventions (raise vs fail, result objects), memoization, and performance idioms. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Explicitly answers both 'what' (idiomatic Ruby patterns, modern features, error handling, memoization, performance idioms) and 'when' ('Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging pure Ruby code'). Also provides clear boundary guidance by directing to other skills for Rails, testing, and code style. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'Ruby code', 'pattern matching', 'error handling', 'memoization', 'performance', 'idiomatic'. Also includes version-specific terms like '3.x+' and concrete features like 'Data.define' and 'endless methods' that Ruby developers would reference. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive by scoping to 'pure Ruby code' and explicitly delineating boundaries — directing Rails to rails-guides, testing to minitest, and style to sandi-metz-rules. This cross-referencing significantly reduces conflict risk with related skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality Ruby skill that is concise, actionable, and well-organized. It focuses on non-obvious patterns and conventions that genuinely add value beyond Claude's baseline knowledge (Weirich raise/fail, nil-safe memoization, result objects). The only weakness is that referenced bundle files are not provided, making it impossible to verify the progressive disclosure structure is complete, though the references are clearly signaled and one-level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient throughout. It avoids explaining what Ruby is or how basic concepts work, instead focusing on specific patterns and idioms that Claude might not default to (Weirich convention, nil-safe memoization, etc.). Every section earns its place with concrete, non-obvious guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Every pattern is illustrated with fully executable Ruby code examples that are copy-paste ready. The Result object class, pattern matching examples, memoization patterns, and string building comparisons are all concrete and immediately usable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is primarily a reference/idiom skill rather than a multi-step workflow skill. For its purpose, the organization is clear and unambiguous — each section presents a specific pattern with when/how to use it. The Common Mistakes table provides clear problem→fix mappings. No destructive or batch operations require validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references four files in a `references/` directory (modern_ruby.md, error_handling.md, performance.md, ood-philosophy.md) with clear signaling, which is good structure. However, no bundle files were provided, so we cannot verify these references exist. The inline content is well-sized for a SKILL.md overview, but the references section at the bottom partially duplicates the inline 'See references/...' links scattered throughout. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
c037ce3
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.