Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured routing skill: per-surface mechanism mapping, executable wrong/right examples, an explicit security validation gate, and clean progressive disclosure into a verified reference bundle. The only weakness is cross-section repetition of the same warnings and doc URLs, which inflates token cost without adding information.
Suggestions
State each high-frequency warning once in a single authoritative place (e.g. Common Mistakes) and cross-reference it elsewhere, instead of repeating 'Flex has no theme prop', the dark-container-background note, and 'consult docs before naming variables' in 4-6 sections each.
Consolidate the repeated doc URLs (createTheme.md, createAuthorization.md, the customization guides) into the per-surface sections only, and drop the duplicated mentions in the checkpoint, Important Facts, and Avoid sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious, product-specific facts (routing table, silently-ignored Flex keys, per-surface mechanisms) and contains no generic concept explanations, but key warnings are repeated across sections — 'Flex viz-items have no theme prop' appears ~6 times, the dark-container-background note and 'consult docs before naming variables' each ~4-5 times, and several doc URLs are listed multiple times. Trimming this cross-section duplication would tighten it without losing clarity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Wrong/right code pairs are copy-paste ready with real keys and values (e.g. the executable `document.querySelector('#sales-chart').options = { theme: {...}, color: ..., axis: ... }` example, `--luzmo-iq-*` CSS variable blocks, and the `client.create('theme')` vs `client.create('authorization', { theme })` contrast), and each surface section names the exact doc URL to consult. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The routing-table-first structure gives a clear decision sequence, the [CRITICAL] Security Checkpoint is an explicit pre-apply validation gate with a stop condition ('If ANY checkbox is unchecked, STOP and fix before proceeding'), and error recovery is routed ('theme isn't applying → use troubleshooting FIRST'). No destructive or batch operations are involved, so no cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-signaled overview: a 'Bundled References' section lists all four verified, substantive one-level-deep reference files with descriptions, bulk detail (full Flex key tables, theme JSON schema) is correctly pushed to the bundle, and the 'If content exists on developer.luzmo.com, link — do not duplicate specs here' policy keeps living specs external. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |