content-research-writer
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:majiayu000/claude-skill-registry-data --skill content-research-writer68
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillEvaluation — 98%
↑ 1.44xAgent success when using this skill
Validation for skill structure
Evaluation results
100%
26%Article Planning: The Rise of Plant-Based Eating
Outline structure and research format
Outline has Hook section
33%
100%
Outline has Introduction section
100%
100%
Outline has multiple Main Sections
100%
100%
Outline has research markers
22%
100%
Outline has Conclusion section
100%
100%
Outline has Research To-Do
0%
100%
Research in separate file
100%
100%
Research uses numbered findings
55%
100%
Research includes bracketed citations
100%
100%
Research has full references list
100%
100%
Research covers multiple sections
100%
100%
Files named correctly
100%
100%
Without context: $0.4073 · 2m 30s · 18 turns · 25 in / 7,647 out tokens
With context: $0.6287 · 2m 45s · 24 turns · 211 in / 8,357 out tokens
100%
27%Strengthening the Opening: A Tech Newsletter Introduction
Hook improvement workflow
Current hook analysis present
100%
100%
What works identified
0%
100%
Improvement areas identified
100%
100%
Emotional impact addressed
62%
100%
Three alternatives provided
100%
100%
Bold statement alternative
100%
100%
Personal story alternative
100%
100%
Data/surprising fact alternative
100%
100%
Why it works explanations
100%
100%
Curiosity question present
42%
100%
Value promise question present
42%
100%
Specificity question present
57%
100%
Audience match question present
28%
100%
Without context: $0.1484 · 50s · 8 turns · 11 in / 2,224 out tokens
With context: $0.4820 · 2m 5s · 20 turns · 26 in / 5,622 out tokens
96%
37%Reviewing a Climate Tech Article Draft
Section feedback and final review format
Section feedback: What Works Well
0%
100%
Section feedback: Clarity subsection
57%
100%
Section feedback: Flow subsection
57%
42%
Section feedback: Evidence subsection
57%
100%
Section feedback: Style subsection
85%
100%
Section feedback: Line edits
100%
100%
Section feedback: Questions to Consider
0%
100%
Final review: Overall Assessment
37%
100%
Final review: Structure & Flow
40%
100%
Final review: Content Quality
40%
100%
Final review: Technical Quality
80%
100%
Final review: Readability
20%
100%
Final review: Pre-Publish Checklist
87%
100%
Numbered citations added
100%
100%
References list present
100%
100%
Without context: $0.2844 · 1m 54s · 12 turns · 15 in / 5,250 out tokens
With context: $0.4713 · 2m 26s · 17 turns · 20 in / 6,878 out tokens
- Evaluated
- Agent
- Claude Code
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.