frontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
83
74%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
98%
1.11xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/data/1-frontend-design/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
92%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly communicates both what it does and when to use it, with rich trigger terms covering many natural user phrasings. The main weakness is that its scope is quite broad for frontend development, which could create overlap with other coding or web development skills. The design-quality differentiator ('avoids generic AI aesthetics', 'production-grade') helps but may not be sufficient to prevent conflicts in a large skill library.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and outputs: 'web components, pages, artifacts, posters, applications' with further examples like 'websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts'. Also specifies the quality dimension: 'production-grade', 'polished code and UI design', 'avoids generic AI aesthetics'. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces) and 'when' (explicit 'Use this skill when...' clause with detailed trigger scenarios including building web components, pages, applications, styling/beautifying web UI). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'web components', 'pages', 'artifacts', 'posters', 'applications', 'websites', 'landing pages', 'dashboards', 'React components', 'HTML/CSS layouts', 'styling', 'beautifying', 'web UI'. These are terms users would naturally use when requesting frontend work. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While it focuses on frontend/UI with a design quality emphasis, the broad scope ('web components, pages, applications, React components, HTML/CSS') could overlap with general coding skills or web development skills. The distinguishing factor is the 'high design quality' and 'avoids generic AI aesthetics' angle, but this is somewhat subjective and could still conflict with other frontend-related skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill effectively communicates a design philosophy and anti-patterns to avoid, which is valuable for steering Claude away from generic aesthetics. However, it lacks concrete executable code examples — the 'Examples' section describes design choices rather than showing actual HTML/CSS/React implementations. The workflow is implicit rather than explicit, and some content could be tightened.
Suggestions
Replace or supplement the bullet-point examples with actual executable code snippets (e.g., a minimal HTML/CSS block demonstrating the 'Minimalist Financial Dashboard' aesthetic with the specific font, colors, and spacing mentioned).
Add an explicit workflow sequence: 1. Clarify requirements → 2. Choose aesthetic direction → 3. Select typography/palette → 4. Implement → 5. Verify responsiveness and accessibility.
Trim the 'When to Use This Skill' section since it duplicates the skill's trigger context, and condense the aesthetic direction list into a more compact format.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill has some unnecessary verbosity — the 'When to Use This Skill' section largely repeats the description, and the lists of aesthetic directions and do/don't rules are somewhat padded. However, it's not egregiously verbose and most content serves a purpose in guiding design choices Claude wouldn't inherently make. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides directional guidance (aesthetic tones, do/don't lists, examples of design approaches) but lacks any executable code, concrete CSS/HTML snippets, or copy-paste-ready examples. The examples section describes design choices in bullet points rather than showing actual implementation code, making it more descriptive than instructive. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There's an implicit workflow (understand context → choose aesthetic direction → implement), but it's not explicitly sequenced with numbered steps or validation checkpoints. For a design skill that produces production code, there are no verification steps (e.g., check responsiveness, validate accessibility, test across breakpoints). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a standalone skill with no bundle files, the content is well-organized into clear sections (philosophy, rules, implementation guidelines, examples) that are appropriately sized. No content needs to be split out, and the structure supports easy scanning and discovery. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
- Commit
3bed9b9
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.