Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-organized reference for a single-purpose generation skill: executable commands that match the bundled script, copy-paste prompt patterns, explicit validation checkpoints (probe, inspect-before-spend) and honest error-recovery guidance. The only structural weakness is that the sequence is conveyed by section order rather than an explicit ordered workflow, and that some operational detail is delegated to sibling-skill files outside this bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative throughout: 'Keys never go in skill files, game code, or reports', the resolution table ('1K for quick concepts... 4K for hero splash art'), and the one-line prompt patterns. There is no explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no padding; every section carries novel, skill-specific policy. This matches anchor 5 ('lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place'). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are copy-paste ready and verified against the bundled script — `uv run <this-skill-dir>/scripts/generate_image.py --prompt ... --filename ... --resolution 2K`, `--input-image` for editing, and the `probe` subcommand all match generate_image.py's actual interface. The prompt patterns are concrete fill-in templates, and the Integration section gives exact output directories. This matches anchor 5 ('fully executable; copy-paste ready; specific examples cover the common cases'). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The section order forms a coherent sequence (credentials probe → commands → prompt patterns → integration → recovery → report) with real checkpoints: the API-key probe is a pre-flight check, 'Inspect the image before spending on image-to-3D or dependent variants' is an explicit validation step, and Recovery gives error-classification guidance ('Distinguish invalid input and authentication from service failures'). It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no explicit ordered workflow or checklist — the sequence is implied by section ordering — matching anchor 4 ('clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: the body stays a compact overview, the bundled script is referenced by a path that exists (scripts/generate_image.py), and the two external references (threejs-game-director/references/asset-recovery.md and probe_asset_credentials.sh) are clearly signaled, one level deep, with resolution of sibling skills explained up front. It is anchor 4 rather than 5 only because the recovery and credential-probe detail lives in another skill's bundle, so navigation depends on the sibling skill being present; within this bundle the split itself is appropriate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |