review-issue

Triage a GitHub issue for hacs_waste_collection_schedule and execute only an approved resolution plan. Use when the user asks to review, triage, fix, comment on, label, or close an issue.

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exceptionally lean, executable, and well-sequenced workflow with explicit approval and failure-handling checkpoints. It is a simple single-purpose skill that fully satisfies the progressive-disclosure bar without external files.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is a tight 8-step procedure with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place.	5 / 5
Actionability	Each step gives concrete, copy-ready instructions including exact agent-spawn prompts and the literal `WCS_GITHUB_APPROVED=1` command prefix.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clearly numbered sequence with an explicit approval checkpoint (step 4), re-present-before-execute feedback (steps 5), and failure handling that preserves the workspace rather than improvising (step 8).	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	A short, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; well-organized into a single numbered workflow, qualifying for the simple-skill exception.	5 / 5
	Total	20 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-scoped description with an explicit Use-when clause and concrete trigger verbs. Minor room for improvement on action-level specificity and a few additional synonyms.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the concrete actions of triaging an issue and executing an approved resolution plan, plus the repo target, but the action set is fairly high-level (no detail on what triage/execution entails).	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly states what the skill does ('Triage a GitHub issue... and execute only an approved resolution plan') and when to use it ('Use when the user asks to review, triage, fix...'), satisfying both requirements with concrete triggers.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural user phrasings ('review, triage, fix, comment on, label, or close an issue') but misses common synonyms like 'investigate' or 'look into'.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Scoped to a single specific repo (hacs_waste_collection_schedule) and a narrow triage-then-execute workflow, giving it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: mampfes/hacs_waste_collection_schedule
Path: .agents/skills/review-issue/SKILL.md
Commit: 82a9f36

Reviewed: 7 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.