CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

redis-state-management

Comprehensive guide for Redis state management including caching strategies, session management, pub/sub patterns, distributed locks, and data structures

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/luxor-database-pro/skills/redis-state-management/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

38%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable — packed with executable redis-py patterns — but it is a severely bloated 2,500-line monolith that re-teaches Redis fundamentals and splits nothing into reference files, with no validation checkpoints framing any of the patterns. It needs aggressive pruning of known-concept explanations and extraction of examples into bundled reference files.

Suggestions

Cut the "Redis Fundamentals", data-structure tutorials, RDB/AOF persistence primer, and other explanations of concepts Claude already knows; keep only Redis-specific, non-obvious guidance.

Split the seven full Examples and the operations quick-reference into separate files under references/ (e.g. references/examples.md, references/locks.md) and keep SKILL.md as a lean overview with one-level-deep pointers.

Add validation/feedback checkpoints to the risky patterns (e.g. verify lock ownership and retry on acquisition failure, confirm queue zrem actually removed the job in JobQueue.complete, which currently re-serializes without 'attempts' and never matches).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~2,570-line body extensively teaches concepts Claude already knows — "Redis (Remote Dictionary Server) is an in-memory data structure store", per-type tutorials for strings/hashes/lists/sets, RDB-vs-AOF persistence primers, and "Redis connections are expensive to create". This is a textbook-style wall of padding, squarely matching anchor 1.

1 / 5

Actionability

Nearly every section ships concrete, runnable redis-py code with docstrings and usage examples (SessionManager, RedisLock with Lua release, rate limiter, leaderboards). It falls short of anchor 5 due to undefined placeholders (database, compute_value, process_event) and real defects — JobQueue.complete() re-serializes without the 'attempts' key so zrem never matches the stored JSON, and find_items_with_all_tags builds identical 'item:*:tags' keys — leaving it at anchor 4's "minor gaps".

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The body is a well-organized pattern catalog with a "When to Use This Skill" section, but there is no sequenced multi-step workflow and no validation checkpoints or feedback loops anywhere (no verify step after cache invalidation, no lock-acquisition failure path beyond ad-hoc sleeps). This matches anchor 3 — structure present, checkpoints missing — rather than 2, since each pattern is internally coherent.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist; everything — Redis fundamentals, seven full example classes, an operations quick-reference, a time-complexity table — is inlined into a single monolithic file. Content that clearly belongs in separate reference files is inlined (anchor 2), though headers keep it above anchor 1's structureless wall of text.

2 / 5

Total

10

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly identifies a Redis-specific niche and lists several concrete capability areas with good natural trigger terms, but it never tells Claude when to use the skill. Adding an explicit "Use when..." clause and recasting the topic list as actions would lift it substantially.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when implementing caching, session storage, pub/sub, rate limiting, or distributed locks with Redis or redis-py."

Recast the topic list as concrete actions (e.g. "Implements cache-aside/write-through caching, stores distributed sessions, builds pub/sub and stream consumers") rather than a noun list under "guide for".

Drop the filler word "Comprehensive" and add missing natural trigger terms users would say, such as "key-value store", "rate limiting", and "leaderboards".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates five concrete areas ("caching strategies, session management, pub/sub patterns, distributed locks, and data structures") but frames them as topics of a "guide" rather than actions, and omits covered areas like rate limiting, streams, and geo-queries. It lists several specific items with minor gaps (anchor 4), falling short of anchor 5's comprehensive action-verb coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear (a guide covering five named Redis areas), but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3. It is not 4 because the "when" is entirely absent rather than merely implicit, and not 2 because the "what" is explicit and specific.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes natural terms users would say — "Redis", "caching", "session management", "pub/sub", "distributed locks", "state management" — but misses common variations and synonyms such as "key-value store", "rate limiting", or "Redis cluster". Good coverage with a few natural terms missing fits anchor 4, above anchor 3's partial keyword set.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Every clause is explicitly scoped to Redis ("Redis state management", "pub/sub patterns, distributed locks"), giving it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk, matching anchor 5. The generic words "caching" and "session management" create only trivial overlap with broader skills, insufficient to drop to anchor 4.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (2577 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

manutej/luxor-claude-marketplace

Path

plugins/luxor-database-pro/skills/redis-state-management/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.