web-audio-api
Web Audio API for JARVIS audio feedback and voice processing
65
55%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/web-audio-api/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is too brief and lacks the explicit trigger guidance needed for effective skill selection. While it identifies the technology (Web Audio API) and general purpose (JARVIS audio), it fails to specify concrete actions or provide 'Use when...' clauses. The project-specific term 'JARVIS' may help with distinctiveness but won't help users who don't know that terminology.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms like 'play sound', 'audio playback', 'voice input', 'microphone', 'speech synthesis'
List specific concrete actions such as 'play audio feedback sounds, process voice input, synthesize speech responses, manage audio contexts'
Either explain what JARVIS is or replace with more universal terms that users would naturally say when needing this skill
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Web Audio API) and mentions two actions (audio feedback, voice processing), but lacks concrete specifics about what operations are performed - no details like 'play sounds', 'record audio', 'apply filters', etc. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Only addresses 'what' at a high level and completely lacks any 'when' guidance. No 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the rubric should cap this at 2, but the 'what' is also weak. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant terms ('Web Audio API', 'audio feedback', 'voice processing') but 'JARVIS' is project-specific jargon that users may not naturally use. Missing common variations like 'sound', 'audio playback', 'microphone', 'speech'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | 'JARVIS' provides some project-specific context and 'Web Audio API' is fairly specific, but 'audio feedback' and 'voice processing' could overlap with other audio-related skills. The scope boundaries are unclear. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, highly actionable skill with excellent executable code examples and clear TDD workflow. The main weaknesses are verbosity (browser support tables, repeated anti-pattern explanations) and the monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting detailed patterns into separate reference files. The content demonstrates strong technical depth but could be more token-efficient.
Suggestions
Move detailed implementation patterns (sections 4.2-4.5) to a separate PATTERNS.md file and keep only the core useAudioContext example in the main skill
Remove the browser support table - Claude can look this up if needed, and version numbers become stale
Consolidate the anti-patterns section with the quality standards section to reduce repetition
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is comprehensive but includes some unnecessary verbosity, such as the browser support table and extensive explanations of patterns Claude would already understand. The 'Common Mistakes' section repeats concepts already covered in implementation patterns. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Excellent executable code examples throughout - all TypeScript snippets are complete, copy-paste ready, and include proper imports and type definitions. The composables are fully functional implementations. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear TDD workflow with explicit steps (write test → implement → refactor → verify). The pre-implementation checklist provides explicit validation checkpoints across three phases, and the implementation patterns show proper cleanup and error handling. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections, but the skill is quite long (~400 lines) with detailed implementation patterns that could be split into separate reference files. Only one external reference mentioned (references/advanced-patterns.md) at the very end. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
75%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 12 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
description_trigger_hint | Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...') | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
license_field | 'license' field is missing | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 12 / 16 Passed | |
- Repository
- martinholovsky/claude-skills-generator
- Commit
1086ef2
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.