Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-sequenced, instruction-style skill with concrete mapping rules and worked examples covering all three sources plus the empty case. Its main defect is the dangling commit-mapping.json reference (the file is absent from the bundle), and secondarily the missing explicit git log command for parsing commits.
Suggestions
Either create references/commit-mapping.json with the conventional-commit-to-category mapping and trim the inline Step 3 rules to point at it, or remove the Supporting Files section entirely — the current reference points to a file that does not exist.
Add the concrete git command for the git source, e.g. `git log v0.7.0..HEAD --pretty=format:"%s"`, so the parsing step is executable rather than implied.
Drop the redundant Step 5 "Expected Output" block, which near-duplicates Example 2's output, and keep one canonical output example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — terse step definitions, category mapping tables, and input/output examples with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. It falls short of the every-token-earns-its-place anchor because Step 5's "Expected Output" example near-duplicates Example 2's output, and the four worked examples carry some redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Input schemas, category mapping rules ("feat → Added", "chore → Omit"), output format templates, and four concrete input/output examples give mostly executable guidance. It is not fully copy-paste ready because git parsing says only "Parse git log between two refs" without the actual git command or pretty-format to use. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps plus an Error Handling section and a Validation checklist give most needed checkpoints, matching the clear-sequence/minor-validation-gaps anchor. It is not a 5 because recovery guidance (e.g., what to do after an invalid git range) is listed as outcomes rather than embedded as validate-and-retry loops in the workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but the single external reference — "`commit-mapping.json`: Conventional commit to changelog category mapping" under Supporting Files — points to a file that does not exist in the bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), and the mapping it promises is duplicated inline in Step 3. This is a dangling reference with inlined content that should live in the referenced file, fitting the some-structure/could-be-better-organized anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |