Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong validation feedback loops, though it is somewhat verbose for a single monolithic file. Progressive disclosure is adequate given the cohesive single-workflow scope.
Suggestions
Tighten or de-duplicate repeated rules (e.g., the 'findings don't launder' / 'confirmed finding may never be resolved by an assumption' guidance appears in multiple sections) to improve token efficiency.
Consider moving the detailed handoff template and follow-up-PR procedure into a reference file referenced from the main body to reduce inline length.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but includes repeated emphasis of the same rules (e.g., findings-don't-launder appears in multiple sections) and some padding that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable commands — `gh pr view --json ...`, GraphQL queries, `env -u GH_TOKEN ... pnpm --filter <pkg> test`, git checkout/branch commands — covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Phase 1–6 workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (approval gates, adversarial check, validate→fix→retry on transition rejection) and feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (Security, Phases 1–6, Behavior Rules) with no nested references, though it is a long single file where some detail could be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |