Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of a dense, executable triage workflow: concrete commands, a clear phased sequence, an explicit transition-rejection feedback loop, and tight prose with no concept padding. No bundle files are present or warranted.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense throughout — it gives concrete commands and operational heuristics (author-history framing, the gh/jq ANSI note) without explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, executable commands (gh issue view --json ..., git log --oneline -20 -- <file>, git blame) plus concrete transition parameters (stage: "planning"/"done", rationale max 1000 chars). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Five explicitly sequenced phases with an explicit validation/feedback loop on the terminal transition — "If it is rejected, read the stated reason, address it... and retry once corrected" — and a checkpoint to take stage/expectedRevision from the factory-phase signal. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the single-file workflow is cleanly organized into named Phase 1–5 sections and a Behavior Rules block, satisfying the well-organized-sections criterion for skills with no external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |