Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary instruction-only skill body: dense, opinionated rules with concrete examples, paths, and lint enforcement on every line, and no wasted tokens. The only soft spot is workflow clarity — the decision ladder and review checklist act as checkpoints, but an explicit step sequence for building a screen is left implicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense throughout — every sentence is a rule, a file path, or a do/don't example ('Token names drift — confirm them in the file, never use them from memory') with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete guidance: exact paths to browse, copy-paste-ready class strings (`bg-(--row-bg)`, `min-w-100`), explicit do/don't pairs (`<DialogContent size="xl" className="h-[80vh]">` fine vs `<Button className="bg-red-500 text-xs">` forbidden), and named lint rules covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The ordered class-value ladder ('Pick the highest rung that fits; each step down needs a reason') and the 'Review smells' checklist with lint rule names provide a clear sequence with checkpoints, but the end-to-end build order (find → choose → wire → verify) is implied by section order rather than stated as explicit steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no bundle files, the ~57-line body stays a well-sectioned overview that points one level deep to clearly signaled repo artifacts (theme.css, README Typography section, the tailwind-v4 skill) instead of duplicating them, making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |