CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ops-automation-agent

Authoring playbook for building agents that automate recurring internal tasks — running scheduled workflows, syncing data between systems, posting notifications, processing inbound events, or executing operational runbooks. Use this when the user wants an agent that runs on a schedule, reacts to events, automates a process, syncs between tools, or handles ops/internal infrastructure.

71

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable authoring playbook with a copy-paste system prompt template, strong validation/checklist structure for destructive ops, and a worked example. The main weakness is threefold repetition of the safety/idempotency rules across sections, which inflates tokens.

Suggestions

Consolidate the idempotency, confirmation-boundary, and safety rules so they appear once authoritatively (e.g. in the Required behavioral rules section) and are merely referenced from the Safety boundary and System prompt template sections, to remove the triplication.

Consider moving the full worked example into a references/ file and keeping only a one-line pointer in SKILL.md, which would tighten the overview and lift progressive disclosure.

Tighten the Capabilities to prefer and Anti-patterns sections to bullet one-liners; some entries restate rules already covered in the System prompt template.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the idempotency / confirmation-boundary / safety rules are restated three times (Safety boundary, inside the System prompt template, and Required behavioral rules), which could be consolidated; this matches 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides a copy-paste-ready System prompt template with fill-in placeholders, a concrete agent identity template, and a fully worked example (Daily Standup Poster) — fully executable guidance covering the common case.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The produced-agent workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints — idempotency check before action, dry-run-then-confirm for destructive ops, and a 5-point 'you are NOT done until' completion checklist with feedback loops, matching the score-5 anchor for batch/destructive contexts.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A self-contained single file (no bundle files present) with well-organized section headers and no nested references; structure is good and navigation is easy, but at ~120 lines some material (full template, worked example) could arguably live in a reference file, leaving minor organization gaps versus the ideal split.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states both capability and usage triggers with concrete actions. The only gap is a few natural trigger synonyms (cron, webhook) absent from the trigger clause itself.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'running scheduled workflows, syncing data between systems, posting notifications, processing inbound events, or executing operational runbooks' — giving comprehensive coverage of the domain, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (an authoring playbook for ops-automation agents with five named action types) and when ('Use this when the user wants an agent that runs on a schedule, reacts to events...') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Use this when' clause covers 'runs on a schedule, reacts to events, automates a process, syncs between tools, or handles ops/internal infrastructure' — good natural keyword coverage, but a few common synonyms (cron, webhook, daily/weekly) that appear only in the body are absent from the trigger clause, so it sits just below comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear niche — recurring internal ops automation — with distinct triggers (schedule, events, sync, runbooks) and minimal overlap with other skill categories.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
mastra-ai/mastra
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.