Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable body with concrete commands, a usable HTML snippet, explicit checkpoints, and clean section navigation. Its main weakness is conciseness: the core explanation path is repeated across three sections and could be consolidated.
Suggestions
Consolidate the explanation path into one canonical ordered list (problem → system context → before/after → code walkthrough → tests → takeaway) and have the "Recommended HTML structure" and "Final checklist" reference it rather than restating each element.
Tighten "Write for approachability" into a short bullet set of do/don't rules, dropping prose like "Use plain language, short sections..." that restates guidance already implied by the structure section.
Consider moving the recommended HTML structure and diagram templates into a referenced file (e.g. `references/structure.md`) so the SKILL.md overview stays lean while keeping detail one level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The explanation path (problem, system context, before/after, code walkthrough, tests, takeaway) is restated three times — in "Required workflow" step 2, "Recommended HTML structure", and again in the "Final checklist" — so the body is mostly efficient but could be tightened; not a 3 because the repetition costs tokens without new information, and not a 1 because it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance throughout — exact git commands (`git diff <base>...HEAD --stat`, `git show <commit>`), a copy-pasteable HTML diff snippet, and specific verification commands (`pnpm --filter @scope/package test ...`, `pnpm turbo build --filter ...`) — matching the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered workflow with substeps is reinforced by an explicit "Final checklist" checkpoint and a "Verification requirements" section stating what to run and to flag unrun verification; the task is generative rather than destructive, so the missing-feedback-loop cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the body is self-contained and organized into clearly navigable sections (workflow, HTML structure, diagrams, snippets, verification, checklist); the guidance is short enough that no deeper file references are needed, so the single-file structure is appropriate rather than a monolithic wall. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |