Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, highly operational skill body: concrete and copy-paste-ready guidance, lean token usage, and a clear workflow with sensible query-strategy advice (targeted queries, namespace filtering, widening only if needed). The only real gaps are the absence of explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow and the lack of any progressive-disclosure structure given the skill slightly exceeds a single-screen length.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient throughout: it assumes competence (never explains what Grafana, Loki, PromQL, or LogQL are), uses dense tables for UIDs, and every section adds non-obvious operational facts. The only trimmable redundancy is workflow step 2 restating the pre-cached UID instruction, which is a deliberate emphasis rather than padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact datasource UIDs, a concrete LogQL example ("{namespace=\"rxocmq9isjfm3dgyf4ujgnfz3c\"} |= \"error\""), parameter-by-parameter instructions for each tool, default time ranges, and specific defaults (limit 100). This matches the 'copy-paste ready, specific examples cover the common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step workflow (clarify scope → use cached UIDs → find dashboards → query → synthesize → deeplink) is clearly sequenced and includes one error-recovery hint ("Only call list_datasources if a query fails with an unknown UID error"), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints. This is a read-only investigation skill, so the destructive/batch cap does not apply; it sits above 'checkpoints missing or implicit' (3) but below the 'explicit validation steps; feedback loops' of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with no bundle files, and the body is well organized into clear sections (Environment, Namespace identifiers, per-tool querying, Workflow) with everything appropriately placed inline. At 68 lines it exceeds the 'under 50 lines with no external references → 5' exception, so it lands at 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than fully earning the top score. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |