Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-structured for a simple skill. The one gap is the absence of a verification step in the note-creation workflow, which is a mutating operation that could silently overwrite an existing note.
Suggestions
Add a pre-write check to the 'Create a new note' workflow: verify no same-named note already exists (e.g., 'find ... -name "<Title>.md"') before writing, and confirm the file was created afterward.
Clarify the 'hierarchical numbering scheme' referenced in step 4 with a concrete example so the instruction is self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — tight bullets and executable snippets with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., what Obsidian or wikilinks are), matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands such as 'find ... -name "*.md" | grep -i "keyword"' and 'grep -rl "keyword" ... --include="*.md"', matching 'fully executable code/commands'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflows are clearly sequenced and search tasks are unambiguous, but the 'Create a new note' write workflow lacks any validation/verification checkpoint (e.g., checking for an existing note before writing), which caps it at 'steps listed but validation gaps'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized, under-50-line skill with clear sections (Vault location, Naming conventions, Linking, Workflows) and no need for external references, meeting the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |