Worktrunk

Help users work with Worktrunk, a CLI tool for managing git worktrees.

Available Documentation

Reference files are synced from worktrunk.dev documentation:

• reference/config.md: User and project configuration (LLM, hooks, command defaults)
• reference/hook.md: Hook types, timing, and execution order
• reference/switch.md, merge.md, list.md, etc.: Command documentation
• reference/llm-commits.md: LLM commit message generation
• reference/tips-patterns.md: Language-specific tips and patterns
• reference/shell-integration.md: Shell integration debugging
• reference/troubleshooting.md: Troubleshooting for LLM and hooks (Claude-specific)

For command-specific options, run wt <command> --help. For configuration, follow the workflows below.

Two Types of Configuration

Worktrunk uses two separate config files with different scopes and behaviors:

User Config (~/.config/worktrunk/config.toml)

• Scope: Personal preferences for the individual developer
• Location: ~/.config/worktrunk/config.toml (never checked into git)
• Contains: LLM integration, worktree path templates, command settings, user hooks, approved commands
• Permission model: Always propose changes and get consent before editing
• See: reference/config.md for detailed guidance

Project Config (.config/wt.toml)

• Scope: Team-wide automation shared by all developers
• Location: <repo>/.config/wt.toml (checked into git)
• Contains: Hooks for worktree lifecycle (pre-start, pre-merge, etc.)
• Permission model: Proactive (create directly, changes are reversible via git)
• See: reference/hook.md for detailed guidance

Determining Which Config to Use

When a user asks for configuration help, determine which type based on:

User config indicators:

• "set up LLM" or "configure commit generation"
• "change where worktrees are created"
• "customize commit message templates"
• Affects only their environment

Project config indicators:

• "set up hooks for this project"
• "automate npm install"
• "run tests before merge"
• Affects the entire team

Both configs may be needed: For example, setting up commit message generation requires user config, but automating quality checks requires project config.

Core Workflows

Setting Up Commit Message Generation (User Config)

Most common request. See reference/llm-commits.md for supported tools and exact command syntax.

1. Detect available tools

   which claude codex llm aichat 2>/dev/null

2. If none installed, recommend Claude Code (already available in Claude Code sessions)

3. Propose config change — Get the exact command from reference/llm-commits.md

   [commit.generation]
   command = "..."  # see reference/llm-commits.md for tool-specific commands

   Ask: "Should I add this to your config?"

4. After approval, apply

   • Check if config exists: wt config show
   • If not, guide through wt config create
   • Read, modify, write preserving structure

5. Suggest testing

   wt step commit --show-prompt | head  # verify prompt builds
   wt merge  # in a repo with uncommitted changes

Setting Up Project Hooks (Project Config)

Common request for workflow automation. Follow discovery process:

1. Detect project type

   ls package.json Cargo.toml pyproject.toml

2. Identify available commands

   • For npm: Read package.json scripts
   • For Rust: Common cargo commands
   • For Python: Check pyproject.toml

3. Design appropriate hooks (7 hook types available)

   • Dependencies (fast, must complete) → pre-start
   • Tests/linting (must pass) → pre-commit or pre-merge
   • Long builds, dev servers → post-start
   • Terminal/IDE updates → post-switch
   • Deployment → post-merge
   • Cleanup tasks → pre-remove

4. Validate commands work

   npm run lint  # verify exists
   which cargo   # verify tool exists

5. Create .config/wt.toml

   # Install dependencies when creating worktrees
   pre-start = "npm install"
   
   # Validate code quality before committing
   [pre-commit]
   lint = "npm run lint"
   typecheck = "npm run typecheck"
   
   # Run tests before merging
   pre-merge = "npm test"

6. Add comments explaining choices

7. Suggest testing

   wt switch --create test-hooks

See reference/hook.md for complete details.

Adding Hooks to Existing Config

When users want to add automation to an existing project:

1. Read existing config: cat .config/wt.toml

2. Determine hook type - When should this run?

   • Creating worktree (blocking) → pre-start
   • Creating worktree (background) → post-start
   • Every switch → post-switch
   • Before committing → pre-commit
   • Before merging → pre-merge
   • After merging → post-merge
   • Before removal → pre-remove

3. Handle format conversion if needed

   Single command to named table:

   # Before
   pre-start = "npm install"
   
   # After (adding db:migrate)
   [pre-start]
   install = "npm install"
   migrate = "npm run db:migrate"

4. Preserve existing structure and comments

Validation Before Adding Commands

Before adding hooks, validate:

# Verify command exists
which npm
which cargo

# For npm, verify script exists
npm run lint --dry-run

# For shell commands, check syntax
bash -n -c "if [ true ]; then echo ok; fi"

Dangerous patterns — Warn users before creating hooks with:

• Destructive commands: rm -rf, DROP TABLE
• External dependencies: curl http://...
• Privilege escalation: sudo

Permission Models

User Config: Conservative

• Never edit without consent - Always show proposed change and wait for approval
• Never install tools - Provide commands for users to run themselves
• Preserve structure - Keep existing comments and organization
• Validate first - Ensure TOML is valid before writing

Project Config: Proactive

• Create directly - Changes are versioned, easily reversible
• Validate commands - Check commands exist before adding
• Explain choices - Add comments documenting why hooks exist
• Warn on danger - Flag destructive operations before adding

Common Tasks Reference

User Config Tasks

• Set up commit message generation → reference/llm-commits.md
• Customize worktree paths → reference/config.md#worktree-path-template
• Custom commit templates → reference/llm-commits.md#templates
• Configure command defaults → reference/config.md#command-settings
• Set up personal hooks → reference/config.md#user-hooks

Project Config Tasks

• Set up hooks for new project → reference/hook.md
• Add hook to existing config → reference/hook.md#configuration
• Use template variables → reference/hook.md#template-variables
• Add dev server URL to list → reference/config.md#dev-server-url

Key Commands

# View all configuration
wt config show

# Create initial user config
wt config create

# LLM setup guide
wt config --help

Loading Additional Documentation

Load reference files for detailed configuration, hook specifications, and troubleshooting.

Find specific sections with grep:

grep -A 20 "## Setup" reference/llm-commits.md
grep -A 30 "### pre-start" reference/hook.md
grep -A 20 "## Warning Messages" reference/shell-integration.md

Hook Approvals in Non-Interactive Sessions

Project hooks and project aliases prompt for approval on first run, so an untrusted .config/wt.toml can't silently execute arbitrary commands. Agents running wt merge, wt switch, or other commands that trigger hooks will hit an error like:

▲ cargo-difftest needs approval to execute 1 command:
○ post-merge install:
  cargo install --path .
✗ Cannot prompt for approval in non-interactive environment
↳ To skip prompts in CI/CD, add --yes; to pre-approve commands, run wt config approvals add

Two resolutions exist — pick based on who the agent is running for:

• wt config approvals add — interactive prompt that stores approvals to ~/.config/worktrunk/approvals.toml. Run once per project; persists across invocations until the command template changes or the project moves. This is the right choice when the human owns the trust decision.
• --yes / -y — bypasses approval for a single invocation. Appropriate for CI/CD where hook contents are controlled by the pipeline itself.

When invoked as an agent, stop and escalate to the user — pre-approval is a security decision about whether this project's hooks should be trusted to run arbitrary commands on their machine. Tell the user to run wt config approvals add (or review and re-run with --yes if they accept the CI-style one-shot bypass). Don't reach for --yes on the user's behalf just to unblock the command.

Advanced: Agent Handoffs

When the user requests spawning a worktree with an agent in a background session ("spawn a worktree for...", "hand off to another agent"), use the appropriate pattern for their terminal multiplexer. Substitute <agent-cli> with the CLI you are running as: claude for Claude Code, 'opencode run' for OpenCode.

tmux (check $TMUX env var):

tmux new-session -d -s <branch-name> "wt switch --create <branch-name> -x <agent-cli> -- '<task description>'"

Zellij (check $ZELLIJ env var):

zellij run -- wt switch --create <branch-name> -x <agent-cli> -- '<task description>'

Requirements (all must be true):

• User explicitly requests spawning/handoff
• User is in a supported multiplexer (tmux or Zellij)
• The user's project instructions (CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md) or an explicit prompt authorize this pattern

Do not use this pattern for normal worktree operations.

Example (tmux, Claude Code):

tmux new-session -d -s fix-auth-bug "wt switch --create fix-auth-bug -x claude -- \
  'The login session expires after 5 minutes. Find the session timeout config and extend it to 24 hours.'"

Example (Zellij, OpenCode):

zellij run -- wt switch --create fix-auth-bug -x 'opencode run' -- \
  'The login session expires after 5 minutes. Find the session timeout config and extend it to 24 hours.'

Parallel sub-Agents (single Claude Code session)

To spawn multiple sub-Agents that each work in their own worktree from one Claude Code session — no terminal multiplexer, no human in the other pane — pre-start each worktree from the parent and pass the path into the sub-Agent prompt:

wt switch --create <branch> --no-cd --no-hooks

Then call the Agent tool without isolation: "worktree", naming the path in the prompt:

You are working in `/abs/path/to/worktrunk.<branch>` on branch `<branch>`.
All edits must stay in that worktree.

--no-cd skips the shell-integration cd script the parent can't consume; --no-hooks is appropriate when each sub-Agent will run its own build/test step (e.g. cargo run -- hook pre-merge --yes) and you don't need post-start setup repeated per worktree.

Do not use Agent { isolation: "worktree" } for this. Claude Code passes its internal agent ID as name to the WorktreeCreate hook, so wt creates the worktree as worktrunk.agent-<id> on a throwaway branch. If the sub-Agent then creates a feature branch on top, you end up with non-canonical paths, orphan branches, and post-start hooks fired against the wrong branch. Pre-creating with wt switch --create keeps path, branch, and hook target aligned.