Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable SMART-on-FHIR guide with concrete HTTP and Python examples and a useful gotchas section. It falls just short of perfect on workflow clarity (no explicit validate/retry loop) and progressive disclosure (single-file, no reference offloading).
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the launch sequence (e.g. 'After step 4: verify state matches and granted scope covers DocumentReference.rs; if not, re-request with corrected scope before calling FHIR') to strengthen the feedback loop.
Consider moving the scopes reference table and edge-case catalog into a references/ file (e.g. SCOPES.md) with a one-line pointer from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence — it does not explain what FHIR or OAuth2 is; every section (launch sequence, scopes table, code, edge cases) earns its place with SMART-specific knowledge Claude likely lacks. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready guidance: a numbered concrete HTTP launch sequence with real query params, a scopes table, and an executable Python snippet using openmed.deidentify/analyze_text covering the common end-to-end case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The launch sequence is clearly numbered 1-5 with validation guidance in edge cases (validate state/aud, handle scope down-grade), but there is no explicit validate-then-fix feedback loop; this is an auth flow rather than a destructive/batch op so the cap-of-3 does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with external standards clearly signaled in 'Standards & references', but no bundle files exist and the ~150-line body keeps scopes/edge-cases inline where a one-level-deep reference file could offload detail. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |