Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, dense, immediately usable skill body: executable Python and cURL covering the core search and pagination patterns, concrete gotchas (status enums, token expiry, pageSize clamp), and a clear OpenMed hand-off. The only slack is minor duplication between sections and slightly distributed validation guidance.
Suggestions
State the 'fully public, no API key' fact once (e.g., in the intro) and drop the repetition in the Quick start line, or fold the cURL variant into a one-line note instead of a full parallel example.
Fold the token-rejection restart and 'cap total pulls' guidance directly into the Workflow's step 2 ("Page through") so the error-recovery checkpoints live inline in the sequence rather than in a separate Edge cases section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and API-specific — no explanation of what a clinical trial is or how requests works; every section (response shape, pagination, gotchas) carries non-obvious information. Minor trimming is possible: the "fully public — no API key" fact is stated twice, and the cURL example repeats the Python example's parameters, keeping it just below the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready code: a complete search function with real parameters, a working example call ("breast cancer" / "trastuzumab"), an equivalent cURL command, a full cursor-pagination generator, and concrete `fields` trimming — specific examples cover the common cases, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow section gives a clear 4-step sequence (build query from OpenMed facts → page through with cursor → persist fields → optionally re-NER) with error-recovery guidance in Edge cases ("restart the query if a token is rejected", "cap total pulls") and `raise_for_status()` in code. It is a read-only search skill with no destructive step, so the validation cap does not apply, but the checkpoints are distributed across sections rather than inline in the workflow — minor validation gaps versus the explicit feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single SKILL.md is well organized into clear sections (When to use, Quick start, Response shape, Cursor pagination, Workflow, Hand-off, Edge cases, Standards & references) with real external links for deeper material, and no bundle files are claimed so nothing is orphaned. The inline response-shape table and gotcha list are compact enough to be appropriately placed here, though a longer field-path reference could eventually justify a separate file — minor organization gaps, matching the anchor 4 example. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |