Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with executable code and a sensible workflow including verification. The main weaknesses are mild conceptual over-explanation and a missing explicit retry loop on audit failure.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'How interval preservation works' section — the ASCII diagram restates a mechanic the one-line 'identical offset → intervals unchanged' already conveys; consider trimming to one sentence.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the workflow's Verify step: 'If audit=True reports a leaked calendar date or broken interval, adjust keep_year/offset and re-run.'
Consider moving the 'Edge cases & gotchas' or 'Standards & references' block into a references/ file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview that points one level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean with each section earning its place, but the conceptual intro and the 'How interval preservation works' ASCII diagram mildly re-explain date-shifting mechanics Claude could largely infer. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Quick-start and per-patient seed-derivation code are fully executable and copy-paste ready, and the workflow gives concrete parameter guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with an explicit 'Verify' (audit=True) checkpoint avoids the destructive/batch cap, but it lacks a validate→fix→retry feedback loop for audit failure. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, yet the self-contained ~125-line body is well-sectioned with clear one-level pointers to sibling skills and external standards; minor room to split edge cases or standards into references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |