Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with concrete lists and a copy-paste PAUSED template; minor emphatic restatements ('No exceptions', 'No partial drafts') and overlap between Baseline and Quick Check could be trimmed, keeping it just below a 5.

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable guidance — an explicit banned-pattern list, a numbered Scope/Build/Cross-check process, and a literal PAUSED message template — with only minor gaps versus fully copy-paste-ready coverage.

Workflow Clarity

The Execution Process is clearly sequenced with a Cross-check validation checkpoint, and the long-output flow has an explicit resume feedback loop; minor validation gaps (no explicit 're-verify scope after continue') keep it below 5.

Progressive Disclosure

At ~45 lines with a single purpose and no need for external references, the body is well-organized into clearly headed sections (Baseline, Banned Output Patterns, Execution Process, Handling Long Outputs, Quick Check), satisfying the simple-skill exception.

Specificity

Names the domain and lists several concrete actions ('Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly'), with only minor coverage gaps; not quite the comprehensive multi-action list of a 5.

Completeness

Clearly states what it does (override truncation, enforce full generation, ban placeholders, handle splits) and includes an explicit 'Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output' trigger; the when could be more specific, so not a 5.

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords like 'exhaustive, unabridged output' and 'placeholder patterns' appear, but common natural variations users would say (e.g. 'full file', 'don't truncate', 'complete output') are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a specific niche (LLM truncation/placeholder enforcement) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap with other skills, though the broad 'any task' phrasing leaves minor overlap risk.