Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, highly actionable skill body with concrete commands and a clear view/change workflow including input validation. Slight gains available from tightening the intro and adding a post-write verification step.
Suggestions
Trim the opening paragraph and the standalone three-scope list, since the same information is conveyed within Step 3's effect lines and the display template.
Add a brief post-write verification in Step 3 (e.g. re-read default_scope from the file and confirm it matches the target) to close the workflow_clarity gap.
Consider whether the display/confirm templates belong in a reference file once the skill grows, to keep SKILL.md as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and actionable with executable bash and JSON snippets, but the intro paragraph and the three-scope list restate information also covered in the steps, leaving minor trimmable explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives copy-paste-ready bash to read the scope, a concrete Write-tool workflow that preserves existing keys, a full resulting-JSON example, and exact display/confirm templates covering the common view and change cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-3 are clearly sequenced with a validation checkpoint (reject invalid targets and show the three options), but there is no post-write verification that the file was written correctly, a minor gap for a config-mutating operation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is a single self-contained file with clear sections (Execution, Notes, Output formatting), but at over 100 lines it is not the minimal under-50-line case that would warrant a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |