Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable read-only audit skill with concrete tool calls and thresholds. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit verification checkpoint in a batch workflow, which caps workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step before reporting (e.g., confirm paginated fetch captured all memories and that duplicate/contradiction counts reconcile with the scanned total).
Tighten the opening line so it does not restate the frontmatter description verbatim.
Optionally show the noun-overlap comparison as a short executable snippet instead of a prose description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with a compact detection table and templated output blocks, no padding with concepts Claude already knows; the opening line slightly restates the description, keeping it just short of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete get_memories call with filter syntax, numeric detection thresholds (>60% noun overlap, confidence < 0.3, 180 days), and copy-paste output templates; the noun-overlap comparison is described algorithmically rather than as executable code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six steps are clearly sequenced, but this is a batch operation (up to 200 memories) with no explicit validation or verification checkpoint before reporting, so the batch cap applies and holds the score at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the single-purpose skill is well organized into When-to-use, Steps, and Constraints sections with content appropriately inline for its size, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |