Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced skill body with executable API details and clear mode branching. The main gap is progressive disclosure: everything lives inline in one file with no external references despite being over 50 lines.
Suggestions
Move the platform-category → display-name mapping table and the cross-project display format into a references file (e.g. references/grouping.md) and link to it from the main flow to improve progressive disclosure.
Factor the repeated filters block (e.g. the user_id/app_id AND filter) into a named shorthand once, then reference it in each call to reduce repetition while keeping calls concrete.
Add a one-line validation/verification checkpoint before display (e.g. confirm get_memories returned before running supplementary searches) to make the read flow more robust against partial failures.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no conceptual padding (it assumes Claude knows mem0 and memories); the repeated filter blocks are executable specificity, not verbosity, and every section earns its place; clearly above the 2-anchor which flags unnecessary explanation. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable API calls with exact parameters (filters, page_size, top_k, rerank), concrete display templates, and a precise grouping table — copy-paste ready, matching the 3-anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–6 are explicitly numbered with clear branching across the three modes (cross-project, peek, full tour) and an explicit empty state; this is a read-only browsing skill so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply, placing it above the 2-anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers but monolithic in a single ~118-line file with no bundle files; the category mapping table and cross-project details could plausibly be split into a reference, so it sits at the 2-anchor rather than the one-level-deep 3-anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |