42Crunch integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with 42Crunch data.
61
52%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/42crunch/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
40%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description is a generic template-style entry that fails to communicate what 42Crunch actually does or what specific capabilities the skill provides. The only distinguishing element is the product name '42Crunch'; the rest ('manage data, records, and automate workflows') could apply to virtually any integration skill. It needs concrete actions and domain-specific trigger terms to be useful for skill selection.
Suggestions
Replace generic phrases like 'manage data, records, and automate workflows' with specific 42Crunch capabilities such as 'audit API definitions for security vulnerabilities, scan OpenAPI/Swagger specs, manage API security policies'.
Add domain-specific trigger terms users would naturally say, such as 'API security', 'API audit', 'OpenAPI', 'Swagger', 'API conformance', or 'API protection'.
Expand the 'Use when' clause with concrete scenarios, e.g., 'Use when the user needs to audit API security, scan OpenAPI specifications, or manage API protection policies through 42Crunch'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description uses vague language like 'manage data, records, and automate workflows' without specifying any concrete actions. It doesn't explain what kind of data, what records, or what workflows are involved with 42Crunch. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | It has a 'Use when' clause ('Use when the user wants to interact with 42Crunch data'), but the 'what' is extremely vague ('manage data, records, and automate workflows') and the 'when' is essentially a restatement of the vague what. The trigger guidance is too generic to be useful. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | It includes '42Crunch' as a trigger term which is specific to the product, but lacks natural keywords users might say such as 'API security', 'API audit', 'OpenAPI', 'swagger', or other terms associated with 42Crunch's domain. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The mention of '42Crunch' provides some distinctiveness as a named product, but 'manage data, records, and automate workflows' is so generic it could overlap with dozens of other integration skills. Only the product name prevents a score of 1. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill provides solid, actionable CLI commands for interacting with 42Crunch through Membrane, with good coverage of the full workflow from installation to running actions. Its main weaknesses are unnecessary introductory context about what 42Crunch is, a somewhat monolithic structure, and missing explicit validation/error-recovery steps in the workflow. The best practices section adds value but could be more concise.
Suggestions
Remove the opening paragraph explaining what 42Crunch is and the detailed hierarchy overview — Claude doesn't need this context to execute the commands.
Add explicit validation checkpoints to the workflow, e.g., verify CLI installation succeeded, confirm connection was established before proceeding to action search.
Consider splitting authentication details (headless vs interactive) and the action creation/polling flow into separate referenced files to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The opening paragraph explaining what 42Crunch is and the hierarchy overview are unnecessary context that Claude doesn't need. The best practices section also contains some filler ('This will burn less tokens and make communication more secure'). However, the CLI commands themselves are reasonably lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready CLI commands for every step: installation, authentication, connecting, searching actions, creating actions, running actions with parameters. Each command includes concrete flags and placeholders. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The steps are listed in a logical sequence (install → authenticate → connect → search → create/run), and the action creation flow includes polling with state checking. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints or error recovery feedback loops for the overall workflow, and the headless auth flow could be more clearly sequenced. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is reasonably structured with clear sections, but it's somewhat monolithic — the hierarchy overview, authentication details, and action management could benefit from being split into referenced files. The external docs link is provided but there are no internal file references for advanced topics. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
56d7336
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.