42crunch
42Crunch integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with 42Crunch data.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:membranedev/application-skills --skill 42crunch61
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
40%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description relies heavily on the product name '42Crunch' without explaining what the product does or what specific capabilities the skill provides. The generic phrases 'manage data, records, and automate workflows' could apply to virtually any integration skill, making it difficult for Claude to know when this skill is appropriate versus other similar integrations.
Suggestions
Replace generic phrases with specific 42Crunch capabilities (e.g., 'Scan OpenAPI specifications for security vulnerabilities, manage API security audits, configure security policies').
Add domain-specific trigger terms users would naturally say (e.g., 'API security', 'OpenAPI', 'security audit', 'vulnerability assessment', 'API compliance').
Expand the 'Use when...' clause with concrete scenarios (e.g., 'Use when the user wants to audit API security, scan OpenAPI specs, or review API vulnerabilities').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description uses vague language like 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' without specifying what kind of data, what records, or what workflows. No concrete actions are listed. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | Has a 'Use when...' clause but it's circular ('interact with 42Crunch data'). The 'what' is too vague to be useful, and the 'when' doesn't provide meaningful trigger guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes '42Crunch' as a specific product name which is a relevant trigger, but lacks natural keywords users might say (e.g., 'API security', 'OpenAPI', 'security audit', 'vulnerability scan'). | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | '42Crunch' as a product name provides some distinctiveness, but 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' is generic enough to overlap with many integration skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides solid, actionable CLI guidance for 42Crunch integration via Membrane with executable commands and a useful flags reference table. However, it includes some unnecessary introductory explanation, lacks validation/error handling steps in workflows, and could benefit from better content organization with external references for advanced topics.
Suggestions
Remove the introductory paragraph explaining what 42Crunch is - Claude already knows this and it wastes tokens
Add validation steps after key operations (e.g., 'Verify connection succeeded by running membrane connection list')
Include error handling guidance - what to do when commands fail or authentication expires
Condense the hierarchy overview into a more compact format or move to a separate reference file
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., 'It's used by developers and security teams to identify vulnerabilities...') and the hierarchy overview could be more compact. However, most content is reasonably efficient. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable CLI commands throughout with clear syntax, flags documented in a table, and copy-paste ready examples for all major operations including connection setup, action discovery, and proxy requests. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed for setup and connection flows, but lacks explicit validation checkpoints. No feedback loops for error recovery (e.g., what to do if connection fails, how to verify actions succeeded). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably organized with clear sections, but everything is in one file. The hierarchy overview and best practices could be separate references. No external file references for advanced topics. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.