Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers strong, copy-paste-ready CLI guidance with a real polling-based feedback loop for connection readiness. Its weaknesses are padded introductory material and duplicated action-discovery guidance, plus a broken step reference ('Step 2' is never labeled) that muddles the workflow sequence.
Suggestions
Fix the dangling references: label the post-connection sections as 'Step 2' (and rename '1b' to fit a consistent 1/1b/2 scheme) so the 'skip to Step 2' instructions resolve.
Trim the intro paragraph and the bare entity bullet list (or fold them into a reference file), and merge 'Searching for actions' and 'Popular actions' into one section with a single consistent command syntax.
Add one worked end-to-end example that substitutes real values for CONNECTION_ID, QUERY, and --clientName so the placeholders are executable as-is.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly command-focused and efficient, but it opens with an unnecessary explanation of what FlexiBee is ('accounting and ERP system designed for small to medium-sized businesses... used by accountants'), includes a bare entity bullet list (Company/Invoice/Invoice Item/Payment/Product/User) that instructs nothing, and duplicates the `action list` guidance in both 'Searching for actions' and 'Popular actions'. This matches 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than level 4, where such padding would be minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable commands appear throughout — `npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest`, `membrane connection ensure "https://www.flexibee.eu/" --json`, polling with `--wait`, `membrane action run <actionId> --input '{...}'`, and a complete proxy flag table. This matches 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'; it does not reach level 5 because placeholders like `--clientName=<agentType>` and the unexplained `--tenant` flag are never tied to a worked end-to-end example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The overall sequence (install → login → connect → poll state → search actions → run or proxy) is present with a genuine feedback loop (poll CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED until READY, check the error field on failure). However, the text says 'skip to **Step 2**' twice while no section is labeled Step 2, and the '1b' heading appears without a matching '1'/'2' numbering scheme, leaving the stated sequence incoherent — matching 'steps listed but... checkpoints missing or implicit' rather than level 4's clear, fully labeled sequence. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single file with no bundle references, well-organized under clear section headers, with nothing buried or nested — matching 'good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. It does not reach level 5 because at ~140 lines, material like the connection-state/clientAction handling could live in a separate reference file, and the entity overview list is unexplained. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |