CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

accredible

Accredible integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Accredible data.

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/accredible/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers largely executable Membrane CLI guidance with a sensible connection-first workflow and clear error-state handling, making it a solidly actionable skill. Its main weaknesses are token waste in the 'No description' actions table, a dangling 'Step 2' reference with no matching heading, and the absence of any caution or validation around the destructive delete actions it advertises.

Suggestions

Fix the broken sequence labels: replace 'skip to Step 2' and '#### 1b' with an explicit numbered Step 1/Step 2 heading structure so the connection workflow reads coherently.

Remove or trim the 'Popular actions' table's empty 'No description' column (20 repeated no-value cells), and either populate descriptions or link the table's action Keys to the `action run` command's `<actionId>` with one worked example.

Add a validation checkpoint for destructive operations — e.g. instruct to run a get-credential or search action to confirm the target before delete-credential/delete-group, and confirm with the user before batch deletes.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Commands and explanations are mostly lean, but the 20-row 'Popular actions' table repeats 'No description' twenty times — pure token waste — and lines like 'Those will be used to adjust tooling to be used best with your harness' are rambling. This matches anchor 3 (mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened) rather than 4, which requires only minor trimmable instances.

3 / 5

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready bash commands cover install, login (including headless completion), connection setup with state polling, action search, action execution with JSON parameters, and proxy fallback, plus a flag table. It falls short of anchor 5 because the actions table lists 'Key' values while `membrane action run` takes an unspecified `<actionId>` with no mapping or worked example of a full command.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Install → authenticate → connect → search → run → proxy is sequenced, with explicit state handling (READY, BUILDING, CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED, CONFIGURATION_ERROR) and re-poll instructions. However, the text says 'skip to Step 2' but no Step 1/Step 2 headings exist (only '1b'), and destructive actions (delete-credential, delete-group, delete-evidence-item) are offered with no validation or caution — the destructive-operation cap holds workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The bundle is a single SKILL.md with clear, flat section headers (Overview, Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Running, Proxy, Best practices), no nested references, and nothing buried. It matches anchor 4 (good structure, most content appropriately placed, minor organization gaps) rather than 5 because the 20-row actions table and entity overview are inline content that could live in a reference file at this length.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

41%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly names the niche app and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause, but it fails to convey what Accredible actually does (digital credentials, certificates, badges) and relies on generic filler ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows'). Trigger-term coverage is thin, so users describing credential or certificate tasks in natural language may not surface this skill.

Suggestions

State the concrete capabilities in domain terms, e.g. 'Issue and manage digital credentials — create certificates and badges, manage recipients and groups, update and search credentials via the Accredible API'.

Add natural trigger terms users would say, such as 'Use when the user mentions certificates, digital badges, credentials, or issuing/updating credentials in Accredible'.

Remove the generic 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' phrasing, which invites overlap with unrelated data-management skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Accredible integration') but its actions — 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' — are minimal and generic; it never mentions credentials, certificates, or badges, which are Accredible's actual capabilities. This matches anchor 2 ('Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic') rather than 3, which requires 1-2 concrete domain-specific actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

An explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause is present ('Use when the user wants to interact with Accredible data'), but the 'what' is vague ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and the 'when' is circular. It sits between anchor 3 (unclear what) and anchor 4 (both present, when could be more specific); the undefined 'what' keeps it at 3 rather than 4.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The only keywords are 'Accredible', 'data', and 'records' — it misses the natural phrases users would actually say such as 'issue a certificate', 'digital credentials', 'badges', or 'verify credentials'. This fits anchor 2 (one or two generic keywords, missing the natural phrases users say); it is above 1 because 'Accredible' is a relevant, user-utterable term.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Accredible' is a clear niche name with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk, but the generic tail ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') creates minor overlap risk with data-management or records skills. This matches anchor 4 ('Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk') and not 5, which requires fully distinct triggers throughout.

4 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/accredible/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.