CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

actindo

Actindo integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Actindo data.

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/actindo/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A solid CLI-integration skill: commands are executable, the connection state machine is handled with real checkpoints, and structure is sensible. Main costs are token slack (the bare entity list, the duplicated 'Popular actions' command) and a broken 'Step 2' cross-reference, plus inconsistent CLI invocation.

Suggestions

Cut or compress the 31-item bare entity list — either fold the entities into the description of what the skill covers, or move them to a references file with one line each on what to do with them.

Delete the 'Popular actions' section or populate it: as written it only repeats the 'Searching for actions' command and adds no actions.

Fix the dangling 'skip to **Step 2**' references by labeling the actual steps (or removing the numbering), and pick one CLI invocation form ('membrane' vs 'npx @membranehq/cli@latest') and use it consistently.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient — the Actindo intro is justified since it is niche knowledge — but it carries clear slack: a 31-item bare bullet list of entity names with no guidance attached, a 'Popular actions' section that only repeats the action-list command already shown, and a rambling Agent Types note ('etc. Those will be used to adjust tooling to be used best with your harness'). This fits 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands throughout (install, login, connection ensure, polling, action list/run with --input, proxy flags table), matching 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. Not 5 because of gaps: CLI invocation is inconsistent (bare 'membrane' vs 'npx @membranehq/cli@latest'), 'membrane login --tenant' leaves the tenant value unspecified, and the 'Popular actions' heading lists no actual actions.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connect-wait-search-run-proxy sequence is clear and includes a genuine feedback loop (poll until state leaves BUILDING; branch on READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR with an explicit 'poll again after the user acts' instruction), matching anchor 4. Not 5 because the body says 'skip to **Step 2**' twice but no Step 2 (or Step 1) heading exists — a dangling reference that breaks the numbered sequence.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, and the single-file body is organized into clear sections (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Running, Proxy, Best practices) fitting 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. Not 5 because the 31-line bare entity list is inline content that earns little per token and the dangling 'Step 2' reference hurts navigation.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description follows the right shape (domain + actions + explicit 'Use when' clause) and the Actindo name makes it distinctive, but the capability statement is templated and generic. Naming the actual operational areas (orders, products, stock, invoices) would sharpen both specificity and trigger coverage.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' with concrete capabilities drawn from the skill's own entity list, e.g. 'Manage Actindo orders, products, stock, invoices, and suppliers; run and automate ERP workflows'.

Broaden the trigger terms to the words users would actually say — e.g. 'Use when the user mentions Actindo, or wants to work with ERP data like orders, products, stock, or deliveries'.

Avoid the circular 'interact with Actindo data' phrasing in the when-clause; state the concrete situations (creating orders, syncing product data, querying stock).

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Actindo integration") but the actions — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" — are generic and abstract, matching the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' rather than the score-3 anchor which requires concrete actions like 'extracts content'. 'Automate workflows' in particular is buzzword-flavored with no concrete operation behind it.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are present: what ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Actindo data"), matching anchor 4. Not 5 because the 'what' is generic and the 'when' is circular (interact with Actindo = use the Actindo skill) rather than listing concrete trigger phrases; not 3 because the 'Use when...' clause is explicit.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Actindo" is the key natural trigger and "data", "records", "workflows" add a little, but common variations a user would actually say are missing (e.g., orders, products, inventory, ERP, fulfillment), fitting the anchor 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'. Not a 4 because keyword coverage beyond the app name itself is thin.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Actindo is a clear niche app and the trigger ties to it specifically, so conflict risk is low, matching 'Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills'. Not 5 because the generic action phrase 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' overlaps with sibling app-integration skills that share this templated wording.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/actindo/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.