Adalo integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Adalo data.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:membranedev/application-skills --skill adalo72
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description has a solid structure with explicit 'what' and 'when' clauses, and correctly uses third person voice. However, it lacks specificity in the concrete actions it can perform and could benefit from more natural trigger terms that Adalo users would actually say. The reliance on the platform name 'Adalo' provides some distinctiveness but the generic action verbs weaken differentiation.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions like 'create/update/delete records', 'query collections', 'manage user data', or 'configure automated triggers'
Expand trigger terms to include variations users might say: 'Adalo database', 'Adalo collections', 'no-code app data', 'Adalo API'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Adalo) and some actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows'), but these are fairly generic and not comprehensive - doesn't specify concrete operations like 'create records', 'update fields', 'query collections', etc. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Explicitly answers both what ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and when ('Use when the user wants to interact with Adalo data') with a clear trigger clause. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'Adalo' and 'data' as keywords users might say, but missing common variations like 'no-code app', 'Adalo database', 'collections', or specific workflow terms that users working with Adalo would naturally mention. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | 'Adalo' is a specific platform which helps distinctiveness, but 'manage data, records, and automate workflows' is generic enough to potentially overlap with other database or automation skills. The trigger 'interact with Adalo data' is specific but narrow. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides solid, actionable CLI commands for Adalo integration via Membrane, with good coverage of common operations. However, it wastes tokens explaining what Adalo is (Claude knows this), and lacks validation/error-handling guidance for the multi-step workflows. The structure is adequate but could benefit from splitting reference material into separate files.
Suggestions
Remove the opening paragraph explaining what Adalo is - Claude already knows this context
Add validation steps after key operations (e.g., 'Verify connection succeeded by running membrane connection list')
Include error handling guidance: what to do when membrane commands fail or return unexpected results
Consider moving the proxy request options table and popular actions to a separate REFERENCE.md file
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The opening paragraph explaining what Adalo is wastes tokens on information Claude already knows. The structure is generally efficient but includes some unnecessary context like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable CLI commands throughout with clear syntax examples. Commands are copy-paste ready with placeholders clearly marked (CONNECTION_ID, ACTION_ID, etc.). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed for setup and connection flows, but lacks explicit validation checkpoints. No feedback loops for error recovery when commands fail, and no verification steps after running actions. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably organized with clear sections, but everything is in one file. The popular actions table and proxy request options could be split into reference files for better navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.