adalo
Adalo integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Adalo data.
72
66%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/adalo/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description adequately identifies the platform (Adalo) and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause, which is good for completeness. However, the actions described are generic ('manage data, records, automate workflows') and could apply to dozens of integration skills. The trigger terms lack specificity beyond the platform name itself.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions such as 'create, read, update, and delete records in Adalo collections, manage user accounts, trigger automations'.
Expand trigger terms to include natural variations like 'Adalo app', 'Adalo database', 'Adalo collections', 'Adalo API', or 'no-code app data'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Adalo) and some actions ('manage data, records, and automate workflows'), but these are fairly generic and not comprehensive — it doesn't list specific concrete actions like creating records, updating fields, deleting entries, or triggering specific workflow types. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | It answers both 'what' (manage data, records, automate workflows) and 'when' (Use when the user wants to interact with Adalo data), with an explicit 'Use when...' clause providing trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'Adalo' and 'data' as relevant keywords, but misses common variations users might say such as 'Adalo app', 'Adalo database', 'Adalo API', 'no-code', or specific CRUD operation terms that would naturally appear in user requests. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' is quite generic and could overlap with many other integration or database skills. However, the explicit mention of 'Adalo' provides some distinctiveness for that specific platform. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill provides solid, actionable CLI commands for Adalo integration via Membrane, covering the full lifecycle from setup to execution. Its main weaknesses are unnecessary introductory context about Adalo that Claude doesn't need, and a lack of explicit end-to-end workflow with validation checkpoints. The structure is decent but could be tighter.
Suggestions
Remove the opening paragraph explaining what Adalo is — Claude already knows this. Start directly with the data model overview or working instructions.
Add a numbered end-to-end workflow summary (e.g., 'Quick workflow: 1. Install CLI → 2. Authenticate → 3. Connect → 4. Search actions → 5. Run action → 6. Verify output') with explicit validation checkpoints.
Add descriptions to the popular actions table — the empty description columns waste space without providing value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The opening paragraph explaining what Adalo is (no-code platform for entrepreneurs, etc.) is unnecessary context Claude already knows. The rest is reasonably efficient but could be tightened — e.g., the 'App > Database > Collection > Record' hierarchy and 'Use action names and parameters as needed' add little value. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable CLI commands for every step: installation, authentication, connecting, searching actions, creating actions, running actions with input parameters. Commands are copy-paste ready with clear placeholder conventions. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow steps are present and logically sequenced (install → authenticate → connect → search → run), but there's no explicit validation or error-handling feedback loop for running actions. The action creation section does include polling and error states, which is good, but the overall flow lacks explicit checkpoints or a numbered end-to-end workflow. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably structured with clear headers, but everything is inline in a single file. The popular actions table and best practices could benefit from separation or the content could reference external docs more effectively. For its length (~100 lines), the organization is adequate but not exemplary. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- membranedev/application-skills
- Commit
56d7336
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.