Adobe Acrobat Sign integration. Manage Users, Agreements, Widgets. Use when the user wants to interact with Adobe Acrobat Sign data.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:membranedev/application-skills --skill adobe-acrobat-sign75
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
75%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description adequately identifies the specific product (Adobe Acrobat Sign) and includes a 'Use when' clause, making it complete and distinctive. However, it lacks specificity in the actions beyond generic 'Manage' and misses natural trigger terms users might say when needing e-signature functionality.
Suggestions
Replace 'Manage' with specific actions like 'create agreements, send for signature, track signing status, add users, configure widgets'
Add natural trigger terms users would say: 'e-signature', 'electronic signature', 'sign documents', 'send for signing', 'signature workflow'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Adobe Acrobat Sign) and lists some actions (Manage Users, Agreements, Widgets), but 'manage' is vague and doesn't specify concrete operations like 'create', 'delete', 'send for signature', etc. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Explicitly answers both what ('Manage Users, Agreements, Widgets') and when ('Use when the user wants to interact with Adobe Acrobat Sign data') with a clear trigger clause. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes 'Adobe Acrobat Sign' which is the product name users would say, but misses common variations like 'e-signature', 'electronic signature', 'sign documents', 'send for signing', or just 'Acrobat Sign'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Adobe Acrobat Sign is a specific product with distinct triggers; unlikely to conflict with other skills due to the explicit product name and specific entities (Users, Agreements, Widgets). | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides solid, actionable CLI commands for Adobe Acrobat Sign integration via Membrane, with good coverage of common operations. However, it wastes tokens on introductory explanations Claude doesn't need, includes an empty-description actions table, and lacks validation checkpoints for multi-step workflows like connection setup.
Suggestions
Remove the introductory paragraph explaining what Adobe Acrobat Sign is - Claude already knows this
Either add descriptions to the popular actions table or remove it entirely since empty descriptions provide no value
Add validation steps after connection creation (e.g., 'Verify connection: membrane connection list --json | grep CONNECTION_ID')
Add error handling guidance for common failures like authentication timeout or invalid credentials
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., 'Adobe Acrobat Sign is a cloud-based service for electronic signatures...') that Claude already knows. The popular actions table has empty descriptions which add no value. However, the CLI commands and examples are reasonably efficient. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable CLI commands throughout - installation, login, connection setup, action discovery, and proxy requests are all copy-paste ready with concrete examples and clear flag documentation. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed for setup and connection but lack validation checkpoints. No guidance on verifying successful connection, handling failed authentication, or confirming action execution succeeded. The workflow is sequential but missing error recovery feedback loops. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably organized with clear sections, but everything is inline in one file. The popular actions table could be a separate reference file. No external file references for advanced topics like complex agreement workflows or detailed API reference. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.