Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a largely executable, well-organized guide: concrete CLI commands from install through proxy, an explicit connection-state feedback loop, and compact tables for actions and request flags. The main deductions are a broken 'Step 2' cross-reference, an unexplained action key-vs-id mapping, and a small amount of content-free overview material.
Suggestions
Fix the dangling cross-reference: 'skip to **Step 2**' is used twice but no Step 2 is defined — either number the sections as steps or replace with the section name (e.g. 'skip to Searching for actions').
Clarify how to invoke a table action: explain that the `Key` column values (e.g. get-nfts-for-owner) map to actionIds from `membrane action list`, or show one worked example running a popular action end-to-end.
Trim the "Alchemy Overview" bullet list (Dataset/Column/Model/Job/Endpoint), which names terms without explaining or using them anywhere in the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dominated by lean, executable commands and compact tables, but includes minor trimmable material: the "Alchemy Overview" bullet list (Dataset/Column/Model/Job/Endpoint) adds no actionable content, and phrases like "Think of it as AWS for blockchain" and "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing" are padding. This matches anchor 4 (efficient with minor instances of over-explanation); it is not 5 due to the content-free overview list, and well above anchor 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste commands cover the full path: `npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest`, `membrane login`, `membrane connection ensure`, polling with `--wait`, `membrane action list --intent`, `action run --input '{...}'`, and `membrane request` with a flags table. The gap keeping it from 5: the "Popular actions" table lists `Key` values (e.g. compute-rarity) while `action run` requires `<actionId>`, and the mapping from search results' `id` to the table's `Key` is never explained, leaving no worked end-to-end example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence runs install → login (with headless variant) → connection ensure → poll → search actions → run/proxy, and the connection-state section (READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR with `clientAction` fields and `error` checks) provides an explicit error-recovery feedback loop. It falls short of anchor 5 because "skip to **Step 2**" is referenced twice but no Step 2 is ever defined, leaving the sequencing reference broken; it is above anchor 3 because checkpoints and state handling are explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single well-organized file with no bundle files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist), clearly sectioned with headers and compact tables. At ~150 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception, and the 12-row popular-actions table and proxy flag table are borderline candidates for a separate reference file, so it fits anchor 4 (good structure, minor organization gaps) rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |