Conciseness

The body is command-first and mostly lean — install, login, connect, search, run, and proxy sections are each a few lines with executable commands — with only minor trimmable commentary ("so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing", "This will burn less tokens and make communication more secure"). This matches "Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed" rather than anchor 5, and is well above the verbose anchors.

Actionability

Guidance is mostly executable: copy-paste commands such as "npm install -g @membranehq/cli", "membrane login --tenant", "membrane connect --connectorId=CONNECTOR_ID --json", and "membrane request CONNECTION_ID /path/to/endpoint", with key placeholders explained ("Take the connector ID from output.items[0].element?.id"). Minor gaps keep it at 4 rather than 5: the single listed action (get-bot-response) has no worked example with real input values, and the proxy path and ACTION_ID remain unsubstituted placeholders.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is clear and well-ordered (install → login with headless variant → check/create connection → search actions → run or proxy), and one explicit checkpoint exists ("When you are not sure if connection already exists ... membrane connection list"). But validation is otherwise missing or implicit — no step verifies login succeeded, no guidance on handling a failed connect or action error — matching "Steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit" rather than anchor 4's "most checkpoints present".

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single well-sectioned file (~110 lines) with no bundle files and no local references; everything present is reasonably placed inline and the only external pointer (official docs) is clearly signaled, so navigation is easy. It fits "Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps" — e.g. the bare "Algomo Overview" entity list adds little, and the standalone "Getting list of existing connections" section could fold into "Connecting to Algomo" — rather than a fully clean 5.

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Algomo integration") but its stated actions — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" — are generic abstractions with no concrete capability (the body's actual action, "Generate a response from an Algomo chatbot", is never surfaced). It matches the anchor "Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic" rather than anchor 3, which requires at least one concrete action.

Completeness

Both parts are present: what ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Algomo data"). It matches anchor 4 — the 'when' could be more specific — rather than 5, because neither the what nor the when includes concrete trigger phrases or specific capabilities.

Trigger Term Quality

"Algomo" is a strong, relevant keyword and "Use when the user wants to interact with Algomo data" gives an explicit trigger, but coverage beyond the brand name is thin — natural terms a user would say like chatbot, customer support, messaging, or bot response are absent. This matches "Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms"; it is not 4 because the natural-term coverage is essentially one brand term plus generic "data".

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The brand name "Algomo" in both the what and the when clause gives a clear niche and low wrong-skill risk, but "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" is generic boilerplate that mildly overlaps with any data-management skill. This fits "Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk" better than anchor 5, whose example shows multiple distinct concrete triggers.