Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, command-driven integration guide: install, auth, connection, action discovery, execution, and proxy fallback are all covered with executable commands and explicit connection-state checkpoints. The main defects are a broken 'Step 2' cross-reference, no validation guidance around destructive update/delete actions, and an unresolved <actionId> placeholder in the run command.
Suggestions
Fix the dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference by giving the sections explicit step labels (e.g. 'Step 1: Connect', 'Step 2: Search for actions', 'Step 3: Run actions') or removing the step numbering.
Add validation guidance for destructive operations — e.g. verify a booking's details with get-booking and confirm with the user before running delete-booking or update-booking.
Include one fully concrete run example that resolves the <actionId> placeholder, e.g. membrane action run list-bookings --connectionId=... --input '{"limit": 10}' --json, clarifying whether the id or the key from the actions table is used.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dominated by executable commands, flag tables, and a dense actions table, with only minor over-explanation that could be trimmed ('This is the fastest way to get a connection…', 'This will burn less tokens and make communication more secure'). This matches the 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' anchor — not 5 because several padded editorial sentences remain, and not 3 because the product intro and connection-state handling are non-obvious information Claude genuinely lacks. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are copy-paste ready ('npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest', 'membrane connection ensure "https://www.bookingmood.com" --json') with a full flag table for proxy requests, matching 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. It is not 5 because 'membrane action run <actionId>' is never concretized — the actions table exposes a 'Key' column but no example resolves whether the id or the key is passed, and no fully concrete run example exists; not 3 because nothing is pseudocode or abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The connection sequence has real checkpoints (poll with --wait, an explicit READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED state matrix with re-poll instructions), but the flow is broken by a dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference for a step that is never labeled, and the skill exposes destructive operations (delete-booking, update-booking) with no validation or confirmation guidance. Per the rubric's cap — a skill whose workflows include destructive operations without validation cannot score above 3 — this is capped at 3. It is not 2 because the connect-run sequence is well-defined with explicit state handling. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized single-file structure with clear section headers (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Popular actions, Proxy, Best practices) and no nested references, matching 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. It is not 5 because at roughly 160 lines with no bundle files, the popular-actions catalog or proxy flag reference could be split into one-level-deep reference files; not 3 because nothing is buried and section navigation is easy. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |