Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, command-driven integration guide with explicit connection-state handling and a good actions table. Its weaknesses are a padded marketing intro, a dangling "Step 2" reference from an earlier structure, and no worked example of running a real action end-to-end.
Suggestions
Delete the marketing intro paragraph ("Builder.io is a visual development platform... reduce developer bottlenecks") and the content-free sentence "When to use which actions: Use action names and parameters as needed." — Claude either knows or doesn't need this.
Fix the dangling workflow references: "skip to Step 2" appears twice but no steps are numbered; either number the sections (1. Connect, 2. Search, 3. Run) or rewrite as "continue to Searching for actions".
Add one fully worked example, e.g. "membrane action run get-content-by-url --connectionId=... --input '{\"url\": \"/about\"}' --json", so the placeholder-only invocations become copy-paste ready for the most common case.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient commands, but it opens with marketing/concept padding ("Builder.io is a visual development platform... It's used by teams looking to improve site speed and reduce developer bottlenecks") and contains filler like "When to use which actions: Use action names and parameters as needed." This matches anchor 3 ("Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened") — more than the minor trimmable instances of anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and copy-paste ready throughout: "npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest", "membrane connection ensure \"https://builder.io/\" --json", "membrane action run <actionId> --input '{\"key\": \"value\"}' --json", plus a popular-actions table and a proxy flag table. It falls short of anchor 5 only because invocations are placeholder-driven with no worked example of running a common action with realistic input, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The install → login → connect → search → run sequence is clear, with explicit state-based checkpoints (poll with --wait until READY, handle CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED via clientAction.agentInstructions, check the error field on CONFIGURATION_ERROR/SETUP_FAILED). It is below anchor 5 because "skip to Step 2" references a step numbering that does not exist in the document, a coherence flaw; it is above anchor 3 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/), so the skill is evaluated as self-contained: at ~150 lines the body is well-sectioned with all content appropriately placed for inline inclusion (actions table, proxy options, best practices). This matches anchor 4 ("Good structure; most content is appropriately placed... minor organization gaps") — the proxy flag and clientAction details could optionally be split into a reference file, but nothing is buried or nested. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |