CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

built-accounting

Built Accounting integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Built Accounting data.

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/built-accounting/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers a genuinely actionable path from CLI install through connection setup to action execution and proxy fallback, with real commands and a well-handled connection-state lifecycle. Its main weaknesses are padding (filler sentences and a redundant "Popular actions" section) and a dangling "Step 2" reference that breaks the otherwise clean workflow narrative. Structure is good for a single-file skill, though some inline reference material would benefit from being split out.

Suggestions

Delete the filler lines — "Use action names and parameters as needed.", the awkward agent-types tail sentence, and the "Popular actions" section that duplicates the action-list command — and either drop that section or populate it with 3-5 real example actions with intents.

Fix the step numbering: replace "skip to **Step 2**" with the actual target heading (e.g., "skip to **Searching for actions**") and rename "1b" to a labeled step so the workflow reads as a coherent numbered sequence.

Add one end-to-end worked example (a natural-language intent, the matching action id from `action list`, and the resulting `action run` command with a concrete `--input` payload) to lift actionability from mostly-executable to copy-paste ready.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient, command-first text, but it contains clear padding: "Use action names and parameters as needed." (pure filler under the entity list), "Those will be used to adjust tooling to be used best with your harness", and a "Popular actions" section that restates the action-list command already shown in "Searching for actions". Fits "Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened"; not 4 because these filler passages are noticeable rather than minor.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable commands appear throughout: npm install, membrane login (including headless completion with `membrane login complete <code>`), `connection ensure`, `action list --intent`, `action run` with `--input` JSON, and a proxy flag table. Falls short of 5 because no worked example with a real action id, intent query, or input/output pair is shown, leaving the reader to interpolate placeholders like CONNECTION_ID and QUERY.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence (install → authenticate → ensure connection → poll to READY → discover actions → run → proxy fallback) is clear and includes state-based checkpoints with a re-poll loop for CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED and error handling for CONFIGURATION_ERROR/SETUP_FAILED. Not 5: "skip to **Step 2**" references a Step 2 that is never labeled (the next heading is "1b"), and the clientAction.agentInstructions feedback loop is described but not operationalized.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single-file skill (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist) is organized into clear, well-signaled sections that keep it navigable. Fits "Good structure; most content is appropriately placed"; not 5 because the ~150-line body inlines material (the entity list, the proxy flag table, and the connection-state reference) that could be split into one-level-deep reference files as the skill grows.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly names a distinct product niche and includes an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, so it answers both what and when. However, its capability statement is generic — "manage data, records, and automate workflows" could describe almost any integration — and it omits the natural domain vocabulary (invoices, bills, vendors, payments) that would sharpen both specificity and trigger matching.

Suggestions

Replace the generic "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" with 2-4 concrete domain actions, e.g., "Create and manage invoices, bills, customers, and vendor payments in Built Accounting".

Add natural domain trigger terms to the 'Use when' clause, such as invoices, billing, construction accounting, job costs, or expense tracking, so users' phrasing matches without parroting the product name.

Tighten the 'when' clause to cover variations, e.g., "Use when the user wants to interact with Built Accounting data — invoices, bills, customers, payments, or reports".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the Built Accounting domain but the actions are entirely generic — no concrete operations (e.g., creating invoices, paying bills, syncing vendors) are listed. This matches the anchor "Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic" and falls short of anchor 3, which requires at least 1-2 concrete actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are explicitly present: what ("Built Accounting integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Built Accounting data"). Not 5 because the 'what' lacks concrete capability phrases and the 'when' is a single narrow trigger rather than concrete trigger phrases.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Built Accounting" is the one strong natural keyword and "data" / "records" add a little, but the natural phrases users of this domain would say — invoices, bills, payments, vendors, expenses — are all missing. Fits "Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms"; not 4 because coverage is thin beyond the product name.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The named product "Built Accounting" gives a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, but the generic "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" wording overlaps with any generic data-integration skill. Fits "Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills"; not 5 because the action wording is not distinct.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/built-accounting/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.