CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

bytenite

ByteNite integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with ByteNite data.

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/bytenite/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers strong executable guidance for the Membrane CLI workflow — install, auth (including headless fallback), connection lifecycle with polling and error states, action discovery, and proxy fallback — with a well-organized single-file layout. Its main defects are a broken step numbering scheme ('Step 2' and '1b' reference structure that doesn't exist), an empty 'Popular actions' section, and several low-value filler passages (the cryptic overview bullets and a platform-intro paragraph that contradicts the skill's own description).

Suggestions

Fix the workflow sequencing: define the numbered steps the text refers to (there is no 'Step 2' and no '1a' preceding '1b'), so the install → login → connect → search → run flow reads as one coherent procedure.

Either populate 'Popular actions' with real ByteNite action examples (id, intent, sample input) or delete the section — as written it is a header with only a generic discovery command.

Trim the filler: remove the 'Use action names and parameters as needed.' line and the cryptic Document/Page/Workspace/User bullets, and reconcile the cloud-cost-optimization intro paragraph with the description's data/records framing so the skill states one consistent purpose.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The bulk is appropriately lean (CLI commands, a flag table, state-machine bullets), but there is real padding: the cryptic Overview bullets ('Document / Page / Workspace / User'), the filler line 'Use action names and parameters as needed.', and a generic platform-intro paragraph ('ByteNite is a platform for optimizing cloud infrastructure costs...') that also contradicts the description's data/records framing. This matches 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation'.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands appear throughout — `npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest`, `membrane connection ensure "https://www.bytenite.com/" --json`, `membrane action run <actionId> --connectionId=... --input '{...}'` — plus a proxy options table. It falls short of 5 because the 'Popular actions' section promises actions but lists none, and key placeholders (actionId, intent examples) are never instantiated with a real ByteNite example.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A rough sequence exists (install → login → connection ensure → poll for READY → search actions → run/proxy) and the connection state machine covers error recovery (CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED, CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but the flow is incoherent in places: 'skip to **Step 2**' references a step that is never defined, and '#### 1b. Wait for the connection' has no corresponding 1a. This matches 'Steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit' rather than 4, whose sequence would be coherent.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This is a single-file skill (~140 lines) with clear section headers (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Running, Proxy, Best practices) and no nested or buried references. It matches 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps' — the empty 'Popular actions' section and the cryptic Overview list are the gaps. It is not 5 because content such as the clientAction state-machine details could arguably live in a separate reference file.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is brand-anchored and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause, which gives it adequate completeness and distinctiveness. However, its capability statements are generic buzzword-level actions ('manage data', 'automate workflows') with no concrete verbs describing what the integration actually does, and trigger coverage relies almost entirely on the single term 'ByteNite'.

Suggestions

Replace the generic actions with concrete capabilities, e.g. 'Manage datasets, run records searches, and trigger ByteNite workflows' — whatever the integration actually lets the user do.

Broaden trigger terms beyond the brand name: include natural phrases a user would say such as 'ByteNite data', 'ByteNite datasets', or 'records in ByteNite'.

Make the 'when' clause more specific about the concrete trigger phrases, e.g. 'Use when the user mentions ByteNite, wants to manage ByteNite data or records, or asks to automate ByteNite workflows.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("ByteNite integration") but its actions are generic — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" says nothing concrete about what is actually done, matching the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic'. It does not reach 3 because no specific, concrete action (comparable to 'extracts content') is stated.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are present: a 'what' ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit 'when' ("Use when the user wants to interact with ByteNite data"), matching anchor 4. It is not 5 because the 'what' is vague and the trigger phrasing lacks concrete variations; it is above 3 because the 'Use when' clause is explicit rather than merely implied.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"ByteNite" and "data" are relevant keywords, but the description offers no natural variations or synonyms a user might say (e.g. dataset, records management, specific ByteNite features). This matches 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms' rather than 4, where a few natural terms would still be missing but coverage would be broader.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The ByteNite brand name anchors the trigger ("Use when the user wants to interact with ByteNite data"), making it mostly distinct in the same way 'Works with PDF and Word document files' is, but generic phrases like "Manage data" and "automate workflows" carry minor overlap risk with general data-management skills, keeping it below 5.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/bytenite/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.