CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

ceipal

Ceipal integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Ceipal data.

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/ceipal/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured integration guide with executable commands, explicit connection-state feedback loops, and a sensible single-file layout sized to the skill. The main weaknesses are a dangling 'Step 2' reference, an empty 'Popular actions' section that promises but does not deliver common cases, and inconsistent CLI invocation (membrane vs npx @membranehq/cli).

Suggestions

Fix the dangling reference: 'skip to Step 2' points to a step that is never defined — either number the sections or reword to 'skip to Searching for actions'.

Populate 'Popular actions' with 3-5 concrete worked examples (e.g. searching candidates, creating a placement) instead of repeating the discovery command, and pick one CLI invocation (membrane vs npx @membranehq/cli) and use it consistently.

Trim non-actionable filler such as 'Use action names and parameters as needed.' and the URL-normalization mechanics.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is command-driven and mostly lean, and the explanations of Membrane connection states are genuinely unknown operational detail. A few tokens do not earn their place — the vacuous 'Use action names and parameters as needed.', the 'Popular actions' section that only repeats a command, and mechanics like 'The URL is normalized to a domain and matched against known apps' — which is slightly more than 'minor instances', keeping it below the lean level-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready commands cover the whole flow ('npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest', 'membrane connection ensure "https://ceipal.com" --json', 'membrane action run <actionId> --input ... --json') plus a proxy flag table. It falls short of the level-5 anchor because 'specific examples cover the common cases' is not met — the 'Popular actions' section lists no actual actions, there is no worked end-to-end example, and invocation alternates between 'membrane' and 'npx @membranehq/cli@latest'.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence install -> login (with headless fallback) -> connection ensure -> poll states -> search actions -> run is clear, with strong error-state handling (CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED sub-actions, CONFIGURATION_ERROR, and a re-poll feedback loop after the user authenticates). It misses level 5 because of a real coherence gap: 'skip to Step 2' references a step label that does not exist anywhere in the document.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Scored against the actual bundle structure — no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist and the body cites no separate files, so nothing is nested or buried. The single ~180-line file with clear section headers is appropriately placed for this skill's size; minor gaps (the mislabeled 'Popular actions' section) keep it below the level-5 'well-signaled references' anchor, which is inapplicable here but reflects ideal organization.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has a clear niche and an explicit 'Use when...' clause, but its capability statement is generic buzzword-level language ('manage data, automate workflows') with no concrete Ceipal operations and no domain-specific trigger synonyms like candidates, jobs, or placements. It would reliably trigger on mentions of Ceipal but undersells and under-specifies what the skill actually does.

Suggestions

Replace 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' with concrete operations, e.g. 'Search and update candidates, jobs, clients, placements, and timesheets in Ceipal'.

Add natural trigger synonyms users of an ATS would say, such as 'candidates', 'recruiting', 'placements', or 'talent management', to the 'Use when...' clause.

Make the 'when' clause more specific about scope, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to interact with Ceipal data (candidates, jobs, placements, timesheets) or automate Ceipal workflows'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Ceipal integration') but the actions are generic — 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' contains no concrete operations such as searching candidates or creating placements. It matches the anchor 'names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' rather than the level-above anchor, which requires 1-2 concrete actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both a 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Ceipal data') are present, placing it above the anchor at 3 where 'when' is missing or weakly implied. It does not reach the level-5 anchor because the 'what' is vague and the trigger phrases are not concrete.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The domain keyword 'Ceipal' appears twice ('interact with Ceipal data'), but the natural terms a user of this ATS would say — candidates, jobs, placements, recruiting, ATS — are absent. This fits 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'; it is above level 2 because the domain keyword is present rather than purely generic language.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Ceipal' is a clear niche with distinct triggers, but the generic middle sentence ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') overlaps with other data/integration skills. This is 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' — below the minimal-conflict anchor at 5, well above the broad-overlap anchors at 2-3.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/ceipal/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.