CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

channeladvisor

ChannelAdvisor integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with ChannelAdvisor data.

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/channeladvisor/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a solid, command-driven integration guide with copy-paste-ready CLI snippets, a comprehensive action catalog, and good connection-state troubleshooting. Its weaknesses are a dangling 'Step 2' reference, missing validation around destructive/batch operations (order adjustments, inventory updates, bulk exports), and padded introductory content (the platform explainer and the vague overview tree) that could be trimmed or split out.

Suggestions

Fix the dangling reference: 'skip to **Step 2**' appears twice but no Step 2 heading exists — either add a numbered step structure or replace the reference with the actual section name ('Searching for actions').

Add validation checkpoints for destructive and batch operations, e.g., 'Before adjust-order or update-product-quantity, run get-order/get-product to confirm the target ID and state, then verify the change afterwards' — their absence currently caps workflow clarity.

Trim the opening paragraph explaining what ChannelAdvisor is and the vague 'ChannelAdvisor Overview' bullet tree ('Use action names and parameters as needed'), and consider moving the 16-row actions table into a references file with a few worked --input examples inline.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Most sections are efficient command-first guidance, but there is unnecessary padding Claude does not need: the opening paragraph explaining what ChannelAdvisor is ('ChannelAdvisor is a cloud-based e-commerce platform that helps brands and retailers...') and the vague 'ChannelAdvisor Overview' bullet tree ending in 'Use action names and parameters as needed'. Not a 4 because these sections plus the verbose best-practice prose are noticeable trimmable content.

3 / 5

Actionability

The skill provides copy-paste-ready commands for every phase (npm install, membrane login, connection ensure, action list/run, request proxy) plus a flags table and a 16-row popular-actions table with keys. It is not a 5 because action examples never show real parameters — the --input example is a generic '{"key": "value"}' and no worked end-to-end example (e.g., list-orders with a filter) is given.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is a recognizable sequence (install → login → connection ensure → poll state → search actions → run), with a good feedback loop for CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED states. However, the text says 'skip to **Step 2**' twice but no Step 2 exists in the document, and destructive/batch operations (adjust-order, adjust-order-item, update-product-quantity, start-product-export) have no validation or verification steps, which caps this dimension at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized and clearly headed (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Popular actions, Running, Proxy, Best practices) with no nested or dangling references, and the skill is self-contained with no bundle files. Not a 5 because at ~155 lines the 16-row actions table and proxy flag reference are natural candidates for a separate reference file that would keep SKILL.md as a lean overview.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has a clear, explicit 'Use when' trigger and a distinctive platform name, so it triggers reliably and without conflict. Its main weakness is vagueness about capabilities — 'manage data, records, and automate workflows' could describe almost any integration — and it omits natural vocabulary like orders, inventory, listings, or marketplaces.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' with concrete capabilities such as 'List and update products, create and ship orders, adjust inventory quantities across distribution centers, and run bulk product exports'.

Add natural trigger terms and synonyms users would actually say, e.g., 'Use when the user mentions ChannelAdvisor, their ChannelAdvisor account, product listings, marketplace orders, or inventory sync'.

Keep the explicit 'Use when' clause but tie it to concrete objects (products, orders, distribution centers) rather than the abstract word 'data'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the ChannelAdvisor domain but the actions are entirely generic, matching the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic'. It is not a 3 because no concrete action (e.g., listing products, shipping orders, updating inventory) is stated.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are present: a 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with ChannelAdvisor data'). It is not a 5 because the 'what' is vague rather than concrete, and not a 3 because the 'when' clause is explicit.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"ChannelAdvisor" is the natural term a user would say, but the description misses common variations and synonyms such as orders, inventory, listings, or marketplaces. It has some relevant keywords but lacks the coverage of a 4 ('PDF files, forms, document extraction' level).

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the specific platform ChannelAdvisor gives the skill a clear niche with a distinct trigger; virtually no other skill would fire on this description, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/channeladvisor/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.